| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1647 |
Swedish party this summer - date?
Hello freaks!
Another Swedish party (such as LCP/St:LCP/BFP/Floppy/etc) will be held this year in july. The partyplace is the same as the one for last year's St:LCP, but now with more tables and a slightly "bigger" approach in general (more like BFP).
There are basically two options regarding the date:
1. 17-19 july
2. 31 july - 2 august
So, please... All of you who seriously consider going there, make a vote for either 1 or 2!
Just wanna check if either date is clearly better than the other, or so.
//FTC |
|
... 45 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
MagerValp
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1074 |
I'll come no matter what, but #1 is definitely easier. |
| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1647 |
Due to various reasons, #1 (17-19 july) seems 98% decided due to various reasons.
Sorry to those of you who can't come then, like Johey, who has been a faithful visitor at many of the LCP parties.
//FTC |
| |
Johey
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 5 |
Ait. I'll try rescheduling my life then. It might be possible after all. :) |
| |
Mindcooler
Registered: Nov 2006
Posts: 28 |
I would have gone with #2 too, because it would have meant two more weeks until deadline :)
Edit: Any indications of WHERE it will take place? |
| |
Shadow
Account closed
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 355 |
Quote: I would have gone with #2 too, because it would have meant two more weeks until deadline :)
Edit: Any indications of WHERE it will take place?
From the first post:
"The partyplace is the same as the one for last year's St:LCP, but now with more tables and a slightly "bigger" approach in general (more like BFP)"
So I assume we are heading to Lund this summer again! |
| |
Mindcooler
Registered: Nov 2006
Posts: 28 |
Doh, I read it as "The partyplace is _about_ the same as the one for last year's", only bigger. |
| |
goto80
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 138 |
i feel that the voting was unfair to start with, since #1 was #1 and #2 was #2. it is of course better if #1 would be #2 and #2 would be #1 AND that #1 would be #1 and #2 would be #2. due to various reasons, it all adds up to sweet irrational democracy, fascist-frantic. |
| |
Zyron
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 2381 |
I agree totally with goto80! F.ex. I would personally have prefered #3 but there weren't any. |
| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1647 |
unfair in, fair out |
| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1647 |
...and: The date is now set!
Keep an eye on the official party site for info appearing gradually from now on:
http://lcp.c64.org
//FTC |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 - Next |
