Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Discussions > 4k intro compo?
2019-10-28 13:53
Didi

Registered: Nov 2011
Posts: 486
4k intro compo?

I found myself coding quite a lot of small intros lately because many current releases to link them are rather small and we do not want to bloat them too much with a giant intro.

Anyone interested to join a challenge creating mini-intros? Different to the 4k category at demo parties 4k would not be the limit for the executable but for memory usage overall at one block. Rules would be similar to Event id #2757 : Intro Creation Competition 2018 just with a lower memory limit and without the requirement for music.
2019-10-28 14:27
Raistlin

Registered: Mar 2007
Posts: 657
Any reason why the memory footprint is limited to 4K? I wonder because, surely, for a small crack, all that matters is the disc size? Eg. If I have a 4K intro that expands out to use 60k, to link to a 3k game, would that be considered lame?
2019-10-28 15:08
tlr

Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1787
Quote: Any reason why the memory footprint is limited to 4K? I wonder because, surely, for a small crack, all that matters is the disc size? Eg. If I have a 4K intro that expands out to use 60k, to link to a 3k game, would that be considered lame?

Yes, because the intro is larger than the game. ;)
2019-10-28 15:08
Didi

Registered: Nov 2011
Posts: 486
That would not be focus of the compo. This is more like 4k Intro at demo compos is defined. Focus would be not to use more than 4k at all which is a different challenge. Even more as screen RAM also counts.
2019-10-28 15:40
Jammer

Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 1335
So 16 consecutive pages + zeropage + whole d800 at our disposal? :)
2019-10-28 15:49
T.M.R
Account closed

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 749
After that "phase" I had in the ICC last year I'd probably have some fun with a 4K memory footprint so yeah, put me down for an entry...

But I still want the regular 16K ICC as well so this is a second category... right? =-)
2019-10-28 15:56
Didi

Registered: Nov 2011
Posts: 486
@TMR: I am currently thinking about to add 4k as a second category to the usual 16k.
2019-10-28 16:15
T.M.R
Account closed

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 749
Quoting Didi
@TMR: I am currently thinking about to add 4k as a second category to the usual 16k.


Sounds good to me, I'll play in the 4K sandpit.
2019-10-28 16:45
TheRyk

Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 2218
Finally! 16K and 8K were enough for intro _collections_.

4K is the way to go!

Count me in!
2019-10-28 17:15
Krill

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2968
Quoting Didi
Different to the 4k category at demo parties 4k would not be the limit for the executable but for memory usage overall at one block.
So 4K in one contiguous chunk of memory while the intro is running?
2019-10-28 18:23
Dr.Science

Registered: Oct 2011
Posts: 40
4k? Sounds like fun :-)
 
... 17 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
Båtsman/Y-front
E$G/HF ⭐ 7
Airwolf/F4CG
CRT
Linus/MSL
Guests online: 138
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
4 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
5 Mojo  (9.6)
6 Uncensored  (9.6)
7 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
8 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
9 No Bounds  (9.6)
10 Christmas Megademo  (9.5)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.6)
5 Libertongo  (9.5)
6 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
7 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
8 Morph  (9.5)
9 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
10 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Performers  (9.3)
2 Booze Design  (9.3)
3 Oxyron  (9.3)
4 Nostalgia  (9.3)
5 Censor Design  (9.3)
Top Webmasters
1 Slaygon  (9.6)
2 Perff  (9.6)
3 Morpheus  (9.5)
4 Sabbi  (9.5)
5 CreaMD  (9.1)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.048 sec.