| |
vex
Registered: May 2011
Posts: 4 |
FR: Let me * star releases to build my personal top list
It would be great if you had the possibility to "star" releases, so that you could build a list of your personal top releases over time.
There is sooo much good stuff in CSDb and it happens all the time that I stumble upon a good release and forget about it later, desperately searching for it afterwards...
With this feature all I had to do was a simple click on a star or some funky little logo to make that release go into my top list.
Just my five cents.. :)
Anyways, thanks for your great work here. CSDb is pure awesomeness. |
|
... 24 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Krill
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2979 |
Don't waste your mojo, Skate, the elders have decided it's unpossible to fix. :) |
| |
Peacemaker
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 275 |
i bet the source does not even have comments.. damn it. the source is lost.. for ever
(sark off) |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11384 |
the missing comments are certainly not the biggest problem in this code :o) |
| |
Skate
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 494 |
You can even obfuscate and precompile. There is always a way to reverse and refactor. So, whoever has the authority to invite me to the dev team and share the repo, please contact me. I'm fine with a denial but at the moment i didn't even get an answer. |
| |
Peacemaker
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 275 |
i bet the source looks exactly how i would code it. so, i am your man, dear csdb \O/
:D |
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5094 |
bet a ready made site engine could do CSDB easily. forums and user system would come for free. rest is database and layout fucking. |
| |
Skate
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 494 |
i'd prefer an mvc php framework like laravel, nothing more. |
| |
Bitbreaker
Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 508 |
Dudes, save up your energy for a proper X-demo. As for the c64, you also accept the restrictions that apply, and you are satisfied with what you have for 30 years without any new fancy features needed. So why should this platform change? |
| |
Krill
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2979 |
"It's just software, can't be hard." :)
But yeah, what Bitbreaker said. CSDb is fine as it is, no need to add vanity functions. |
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5094 |
no csdb is not fine as it is, and its not a rigid hw platform.
- last comment should be editable
- all comment types should be displayed on one page
- search function is horrible
yadda yadda. |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 - Next |
