| |
Burglar
Registered: Dec 2004 Posts: 1085 |
the ed and joe graphic spam bomb
guys, do we really need those tons and tons of already released material to csdb? I think not.
especially when you don't even upload a file with it. if I want to see your stuff, I'll check the original production. |
|
... 79 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts.... |
| |
Burglar
Registered: Dec 2004 Posts: 1085 |
I should start making seperate entries for all scrolltexts I wrote in intros ;)
(pun intended!;) |
| |
TDJ
Registered: Dec 2001 Posts: 1879 |
Quote: I should start making seperate entries for all scrolltexts I wrote in intros ;)
(pun intended!;)
If I did something like that, not only csdb would explode but the rest of the Internet as well. |
| |
Joe
Registered: Apr 2002 Posts: 226 |
You guys make me sick, now here's a reason alone just to fuck this scene over once and for all. You are so full of shit! |
| |
Burglar
Registered: Dec 2004 Posts: 1085 |
Quote: Actually it has all to do with "respect", I'm simply saying: I'm soon off from this scene, and here is my legacy, my heritage for the scene to participate, enjoy, feel inspired of etc. Now I told Incubus once, that I should be amongst the last to leave the scene. Well I guess, in retrospect it was a rather naive image. Now you may ever think what you do, so long I'm not even there. But then again, thanks for making my day!
I dont really see the respect in adding "vn #xx intro gfx" "vn #xx editorial 1" "vn #xx editorial 2", etc etc. I can only see a disrespect for the database...
now what I do respect is all the great gfx you made for so many different productions on the 64.
I take my hat off and bow to you, and will miss your productions (if you are indeed leaving the scene).
Burglar |
| |
Ed
Registered: May 2004 Posts: 173 |
(and i returned on a richard friday!)
Seriously... I wish for you to stop your whining and get those 30 mb or gb of c64 warez ready for the scs-trc ftp instead. :) you can skip the dupes there...
I am not sure I ever heard the "dupe thing" apply to the legal scene. Heck just the other month or two I saw a release with a 100, 101, 102% being released. With some good reasons nontheless. ok so it was perhaps some "illegal" thing anyway and passed thanks to that, or? Did not hear any words about that. Please, prove me wrong.
Now you tell me how to handle all those turbo assembler releases, where only one single color is the R E A L difference? arguments or not.. how should we deal with this situation then? this SPAM situation... hard words for someone who just got more than 40 new releases... I dont hear those complaints when i see dousin of lousy cracks uploaded each and every day!
And what about fairlight, they released 600 releases.. or scs-trc??? my god ... (I am just giving you some examples here, not in any way intented to hurt peoples feelings but to give you a heterogeneous image).
If you feel the dupe thing is annoying. Then please suggest a list of things to be removed. I will soon start to add the .prg and .d64 files ;D You could save me hours and days of work here...
And besides. Please explain your act to everyone that actually thinks it is a good thing.
|
| |
Higgie
Registered: Apr 2002 Posts: 116 |
hi there!
1. i really like most of the stuff joe did over the years. so, joe, don't leave and continue provoking us with some post modern creations.
2. how about building a counterpart of HVSC for gfx? who want's to join? a database for all the chars, logos, fullscreens... that were ever done. including workstages whenever possible. that would be an appropriate way of preserving history in the field of c64 gfx art. (no joking here! what do you think about a HighPixelGrafixCollection aka 'HPGC'?) :) |
| |
Ed
Registered: May 2004 Posts: 173 |
Higgie: now that sounds like a good idea. make csdb into seperate chapters:
crackers/illegal (never really wanted to take apart of that scene.. sure movies are nice and apps but... not participating in doing it myself)
demos
intros
graphics/logos/fonts
other stuff...
and yeah.. make .sid in a different category. according to some it is not a release here at csdb. oh my ;D
|
| |
Burglar
Registered: Dec 2004 Posts: 1085 |
Quote:If you feel the dupe thing is annoying. Then please suggest a list of things to be removed. I will soon start to add the .prg and .d64 files ;D You could save me hours and days of work here...
everything that was already released in for example a magazine. reread my previous post to find out ;)
the best way to solve all this is to create c64 gfx database, with all gfx ever put out. but csdb doesnt have that, and thats the root of the problem. no musician is adding all his tunes to csdb either, we have hvsc for that. we should have something like that for gfx aswell.
obviously I totally dig the "Collection *" stuff you released in the last 2 days, it should go without saying that those should stay and get a high vote aswell ;) |
| |
Burglar
Registered: Dec 2004 Posts: 1085 |
oh heh, higgie just said the same thing ;)
I wouldnt mind helping out in building a system for that |
| |
Higgie
Registered: Apr 2002 Posts: 116 |
@burglar: just wanted to blame you for ripping my idea from my previous post! ;) |
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 - Next |