| |
Bitbreaker
Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 501 |
boobsploitation
So i never understood the fuzz about choosing boobs as a motif. Nude bodies have always been part of art. Also boobs are a thankful motif, as they keep one motivated to continue and finish a picture. Actually i adore and worship the female body. For me, nothing does feel wrong about that. But i somehow feel like there's a lot of mental masturbation going on. So feel free to bring your arguments against boobs forward. Maybe some nice drama will develop from that!
And yes, of course i'll continue drawing boobs, don't bother :-) |
|
... 251 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11182 |
i am actually waiting for didi to exomize the thread and link an intro to it |
| |
jailbird
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1576 |
Quote: i am actually waiting for didi to exomize the thread and link an intro to it
It will be great art. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11182 |
the most feminist release ever! |
| |
Bitbreaker
Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 501 |
Quoting JailbirdBitbreaker wanted drama, we provided. Entertainment is a valuable form of activity!
No ragequit, no drama, sorry. |
| |
jailbird
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1576 |
Quote: Quoting JailbirdBitbreaker wanted drama, we provided. Entertainment is a valuable form of activity!
No ragequit, no drama, sorry.
Aw, but we tried so hard :( |
| |
ChristopherJam
Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 1391 |
Groepaz, the term "significant other" has been around since the 1950s, though it first became popular in the US in the 70s and 80s. I first came across it on newsgroups about relationships in the late 80s - before the world wide web even existed never mind social media sites like facebook etc.
It's gender neutral, and avoids having to define the extent to which the relationship's been formalised (gf? fiancé? wife? bff?) |
| |
ChristopherJam
Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 1391 |
Jailbird wrote:
Quote:Considering the popular sites, I'd be the first to say that there is indeed a lot of idiotic content, but there is also a great amount of intelligent and useful substance on them. You just have to filter well, it ain't that hard. And you may do know about them, but in that case, you keep ignoring their positive sides for some reasons unbeknownst to me.
Yes, this! Decrying all content on (e.g.) twitter etc is like saying all phone calls or books are stupid. The medium is not the message. |
| |
ChristopherJam
Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 1391 |
As for the original topic, yes, there's nothing wrong with artistic nudity per se, but converted scans of porn is just lazy, and the imbalance in male vs female representation is exclusionary and arguably misogynistic. It certainly does nothing to encourage women to be involved in the scene. |
| |
jailbird
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1576 |
Quote: Groepaz, the term "significant other" has been around since the 1950s, though it first became popular in the US in the 70s and 80s. I first came across it on newsgroups about relationships in the late 80s - before the world wide web even existed never mind social media sites like facebook etc.
It's gender neutral, and avoids having to define the extent to which the relationship's been formalised (gf? fiancé? wife? bff?)
Don't bother CJam, being the knowledgeable and informed man he is, I am pretty sure he exactly knows what "significant other" means. He was just not familiar with the abbreviation, which is actually quite reasonable considering he's practically living on CSDb :) |
| |
ChristopherJam
Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 1391 |
Hah! Well the abbreviation's also older than HTTP, but I still take your point. |
| Previous - 1 | ... | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 - Next |
