| |
hedning
Registered: Mar 2009 Posts: 4734 |
Release id #176969 : Super Mario Bros 64 +2
User Comment
Submitted by hedning [PM] on 19 April 2019
G*P perspective. This is turning into a discussion. Will copy the discussion to the forum.. From my moderator perspective.
User Comment
Submitted by Mr Ammo [PM] on 19 April 2019
"from our perspective". Is that your CSDb moderator / CSDb rules perspective or is it your G*P perspective. I feel there is a conflict of interest when you answer this question.
User Comment
Submitted by hedning [PM] on 19 April 2019
From our perspective they are part of the same release. They were released together as it was meant. And they are both working.
There are many examples on releases that have different sorts of files in the same release: d64 and d81 versions of diskmags, cracks etc. Even mixed easyflash and disk versions of the same release in the same entry as they were released together.
User Comment
Submitted by Mr Ammo [PM] on 19 April 2019
Since the 191 blox version is a different version of this release, shouldn't there be a different release entry for this version as per CSDb rules and what the mods preach?
That way there will be a release entry for a working version and a non-working version for vanilla C64s.User |
|
... 30 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts.... |
| |
Raistlin
Registered: Mar 2007 Posts: 688 |
@Pitcher: I'm honestly not interested in the dumb arguments here... the "lies" that I talked of are clear from my posts. I talk of people saying on the one hand that they don't care about the First Release compo - but on the other, they're avoiding cracking any games that another group has First Released... which suggests that they -do- care.
@Jazzcat: Lolol. Maybe you should stick to writing your little Sex'n'Crime wannabe ;-) |
| |
Moloch
Registered: Jan 2002 Posts: 2929 |
This thread has outlived any sort of usefulness |
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 - Next |