Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Entries > Group id #223 : Protovision
2006-02-26 13:23
Scout

Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 1570
Group id #223 : Protovision

There are some entries from Protovision that should be deleted from the database.
Those entries are commercial releases (without a downloadlink) and not scenereleases.

---
-= Silicon Ltd. =-
http://forum.siliconlimited.com

Commodore 64 Scenemusic Podcast
http://8bitmayhem.blogspot.com/
 
... 71 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2007-11-26 19:36
MorGorr
Account closed

Registered: May 2002
Posts: 47
If anyone set up a game creators' data base I'd be happy to contribute.
2007-11-26 19:48
Mermaid

Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 338

yeah...you people probably just need a hug or something
2007-11-26 20:01
MorGorr
Account closed

Registered: May 2002
Posts: 47

...or something hehe
2007-11-26 23:35
MagerValp

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1078
Quote: If anyone set up a game creators' data base I'd be happy to contribute.

http://www.gb64.com/
2007-11-26 23:51
MorGorr
Account closed

Registered: May 2002
Posts: 47
GB64 is a fine game database, but not a game creators' database. What I could imagine is a DB that is more focused on post-1992 games and the people behind. Fewer entries than in GB64, more info in each entry.
2007-11-27 03:35
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386
what i could imagine is that about 10 people are interisted in such a database if you can't download the games there =P
2007-11-27 07:11
cadaver

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1160
So if the beef is with the rules (or wording of them) maybe it'd be better to adjust them slightly rather than go into trouble of creating of yet another C64 related site..

That said, IMO game and demo creation arts (and possibly even cracking once we get to a deep enough level of modification and effort) are equal, 174848 bytes or multiple thereof set into correct values, somehow I get the feeling that MorGorr wants added glory by having a small dedicated database :)

Btw. I checked the changed rules text, and in some ways it's rather sorry reading (sorry!) giving a sort of quite mentally unbalanced impression, rather than a benevolent, knowledgeful dictator which the CSDB should (IMO) represent as an entity. I know there's the problem of issues that have no clear-cut right answers but just some editing of the text & wording would probably give better impression.
2007-11-27 07:21
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386
feel free to suggest better wording :) we know they aren't optimal (then again, what is?). we just felt the need to write down what we *thought* would be common knowledge. but last not least the barracuda BS taught us we were very wrong, and that we need to write it out.
2007-11-27 09:15
Radiant

Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 639
This is a thoroughly silly discussion. Releases made unto the scene should be in this database, scene-related events should be in this database, scene groups should be here. Commercial games should not be here, unless they are scene releases (no games that I know of). Games and companies that are distinctively anti-scene should definitely not have entries here, nor should they want to.

This site is about the C64 scene. It's not a tricky concept, there's no need for trying to find semantic loopholes to be able to insert your non-scene productions into it.
2007-11-27 09:27
CreaMD

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3057
Quote: This is a thoroughly silly discussion. Releases made unto the scene should be in this database, scene-related events should be in this database, scene groups should be here. Commercial games should not be here, unless they are scene releases (no games that I know of). Games and companies that are distinctively anti-scene should definitely not have entries here, nor should they want to.

This site is about the C64 scene. It's not a tricky concept, there's no need for trying to find semantic loopholes to be able to insert your non-scene productions into it.


Antiscene companies in 2007? buhahahahahahahhahahahahahhaha haha ahha ahha haha hahahhahhaaha. .

... fell off from chair...

Yeah, let's burn the evil PTV.

GPZ: I agree with you, this debate never solves anything. It would be best to lock it for few years until we all grow up, finally.
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
Frostbyte/Artline De..
grass/LETHARGY
The Human Co../Maste..
csabanw
Dano/Padua
E$G/HF ⭐ 7
Guests online: 94
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Mojo  (9.7)
4 Coma Light 13  (9.6)
5 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
6 What Is The Matrix 2  (9.6)
7 The Demo Coder  (9.6)
8 Uncensored  (9.6)
9 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
10 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 No Listen  (9.6)
2 Layers  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
5 Copper Booze  (9.6)
6 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
7 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
8 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
9 Morph  (9.5)
10 Libertongo  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Performers  (9.3)
2 Booze Design  (9.3)
3 Oxyron  (9.3)
4 Triad  (9.3)
5 Censor Design  (9.3)
Top Logo Graphicians
1 t0m3000  (10)
2 Sander  (9.8)
3 Mermaid  (9.5)
4 Facet  (9.4)
5 Shine  (9.4)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.057 sec.