Welcome to our latest new user
danikAdmiral
! (Registered 2024-12-17)
You are not logged in -
nap
CSDb User Forums
Forums
>
CSDb Feedback
>
Top list for added screen shots?
2005-09-25
12:41
tlr
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1790
Top list for added screen shots?
First of all, I respect that not everybody wants to take the time to add screenshots.
Personally I think it's nice to have them, even for text-tools and similar. I guess I'm a visual kind of person. :)
Anyway, to motivate people that are adding screenshots, could we have a top list of which people added the most screenshots on the statistics page?
... 30 posts hidden. Click
here
to view all posts....
2005-09-27
11:17
Nafcom
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 588
Quote:
do you think that pouet with its run for points has a bigger problem than csdb with incomplete entries, missing download links and such ?
I just said, I fear it could happen. That's all I said.
I am no Pouet.net freak.
2005-10-02
02:02
Dishy
Registered: Mar 2002
Posts: 241
Hey
Well, some years ago - when I was studying economics, I didn´t like statistics, so I dropped out ;-) Anyway, but here at CSDb I think the statistics under Fun Stuff is quite funny, so like TLR, Sledge, Zyron etc. I also think that the points in here is nice, and hopefully they´re not only funny, but can also motivate a little, so even more people start too add a little more in here to this database. Some people in here only adds information etc. for their own group(s), but if these points in here could just motivate a few also to care and add information about other old groups/persons/releases from the past, then I think, there are many benefits with the points.. So they should not be removed!
I started a topic called The Historie Of C64-Scene - A Never Ending Story! back in early 2004 (link:
The Historie Of C64-Scene - A Never Ending Story!
), but I got no response at all. What I wanted back then , was to divide / split up some of the statistics, so the uploaders of wares didn´t get points at the same place as the normal active submitters, who didn´t upload anything, but were (only) submitting information.. Back then I didn´t think, that it shoud be mixed, as some people were just uploading wares without thinking about adding all old groups, sceners etc Anyway, that´s probably not a problem anymore, as I guess most groups/persons have already been added to CSDd by now.
Hmm, all in all eeehh, I guess what I´m trying to say here in the middle of the night, is that I wouldn´t mind if there were even more statistics, and I find them funny and good. Points for screenshots would also be nice, I think, but I don´t really care that much about this one. And of course I don´t add information in here because of the points. As writing in The Historie Of C64-Scene - A Never Ending Story! back then, I had not even discovered "Misc. Statistics in here before, I had added lots of groups and persons to CSDb. I added all the information because of the history and not the points at all! BUT!!! I do remember, that I thought it was a great idea, when I finally discovered it, because I knew, I would keep on helping getting CSDb better and better, and then I actually liked, that there was this point system..! ;-)
I do see the problem, that HCL refers to, about stupid persons that starts to add empty entries, but as far as I know, that´s not a big problem in here, and I don´t think, it would become a problem. They´re just making a fool of oneself by doing that.. And you know, today you can even see, who´s the creater of the information!
I´ve also used lots of time (and still do) correcting information here at CSDb at already added information, which are wrong or missing lots of details. I still find lots of releases, groups, persons where there are missing a hell lot of stuff. When correcting this you also don´t get any points at all, but - maybe - some points here, would actually help motivation people to help correcting all these things??? I don´t know Also this would make the new TIMELINE (link:
http://noname.c64.org/csdb/forums/?roomid=8&topicid=18000&showa..
) (which I like) much much better. There would be a much better overview at this Timeline, if people tried to clear up, some of all the missing information. If you´re not sure about, when a person left a group, or when a release was actually released, then try to ask at CSDb or search for information in old mags, notes etc. (that´s what I´ve done, but it takes a hell lot of my time, and of course it´s not everybody, who wants to use (ehh, is crazy enough to use ;-), that much time in checking up old information in mags and notes, which is about 11-15 years old, *LOL* ------> ^^ ^^ But it IS a chance of getting a much better overview (But it takes time!!)
Off to sleep!! A way too tired to write all this!
Regards, Dishy
*****Once A Scener - Always A Scener*****
2005-10-12
14:59
Nafcom
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 588
http://noname.c64.org/csdb/release/viewpic.php?id=21495&zoom=1
this is an example that some people cannot do screenhots still, uploaded in tiny size, thenby click zoomed into crappy blocks.
and it's a recent entry! And many entries have blocky screenshots like this
Many people don't listen :(
2005-10-12
15:50
tlr
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1790
Quote:
http://noname.c64.org/csdb/release/viewpic.php?id=21495&zoom=1
this is an example that some people cannot do screenhots still, uploaded in tiny size, thenby click zoomed into crappy blocks.
and it's a recent entry! And many entries have blocky screenshots like this
Many people don't listen :(
It is not tiny in size. It is blocky because it is a gif of an emulated TV-screen. The number of colors in this gif is not enough so it has to dither. Never use gifs, use pngs.
2005-10-12
17:08
Nafcom
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 588
Quote:
It is not tiny in size. It is blocky because it is a gif of an emulated TV-screen. The number of colors in this gif is not enough so it has to dither. Never use gifs, use pngs.
Oh, ok then! But then my hint: He could use local colour palette instead of global one. I do that for the SWO screenshots since a couple of issues, and it works :)
I still think they look kinda blocky at the linked example, hmm. So sorry for assuming incorrectly first, if so.
Previous
-
1
|
2
|
3
| 4 - Next
Refresh
Subscribe to this thread:
You need to be logged in to post in the forum.
Search the forum:
Search
All forums
C64 Coding
C64 Composing
C64 Pixeling
C64 Productions
CSDb Bug Reports
CSDb Development
CSDb Discussions
CSDb Entries
CSDb Feedback
CSDb Info
CSDb moderators
CSDb Questions
Messages to moderators
Requests
for
in
Writer & text
Text
Writer
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
All
Releases
Groups
Sceners
Events
BBS
SIDs
-------
Forum
Comments
Advanced
Users Online
Acidchild/Padua
Andy/AEG
Mike
Ricky/Bonzai
psych
rambo/Therapy/ Resou..
commodore_freak
t0m3000/hf^boom!^ibx
Lord Crucifier/SCS*TRC
Guests online: 75
Top Demos
1
Next Level
(9.7)
2
13:37
(9.7)
3
Mojo
(9.6)
4
Coma Light 13
(9.6)
5
Edge of Disgrace
(9.6)
6
What Is The Matrix 2
(9.6)
7
The Demo Coder
(9.6)
8
Uncensored
(9.6)
9
Comaland 100%
(9.6)
10
Wonderland XIV
(9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1
Layers
(9.6)
2
No Listen
(9.6)
3
Party Elk 2
(9.6)
4
Cubic Dream
(9.6)
5
Copper Booze
(9.6)
6
Rainbow Connection
(9.5)
7
Dawnfall V1.1
(9.5)
8
Onscreen 5k
(9.5)
9
Morph
(9.5)
10
Libertongo
(9.5)
Top Groups
1
Performers
(9.3)
2
Booze Design
(9.3)
3
Oxyron
(9.3)
4
Triad
(9.3)
5
Censor Design
(9.3)
Top Swappers
1
Derbyshire Ram
(10)
2
Jerry
(9.8)
3
Violator
(9.7)
4
Acidchild
(9.7)
5
Cash
(9.6)
Home
-
Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.12 sec.