| |
Scout
Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 1570 |
Friend lists (CSDb as a Social Networking site...eeek!)
The scene was always friendshipbased, right?
So wouldn't it be a nice idea to add some kind of friend list in your profile?
Not only to jump on the social networking bandwagon but also to shield off some (personal) data you only wish to share with good scene-friends like phonenumbers, IM info and addresses.
Just a sunday afternoon brainwave. |
|
... 45 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
jailbird
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1578 |
Quote: SHE IS HAXXORED!! i told ya!! It's just pure weirdness coming from her now. Dark lord of the sith took her, she no be turnin back like normal again.
I mean, we all know what happened to young Anakin Skywalker.. EvilMaid *is* Dath Vader now, and there's no playing with her! OMG, baked Elmos.. unlimited evilness.
Just look at this:
She's beheading Elmos and cooking them!!! And the poor guys were smiling at her before their deaths, I bet she lurked them with hugs and hearts before the sudden attack. |
| |
Danzig
Registered: Jun 2002
Posts: 440 |
for those idiots who don't know: woman are twofaced by design ;)
EDIT: MEANMAID>:(
 |
| |
TWR
Account closed
Registered: Jan 2004
Posts: 187 |
Quote: The scene was always friendshipbased, right?
So wouldn't it be a nice idea to add some kind of friend list in your profile?
Not only to jump on the social networking bandwagon but also to shield off some (personal) data you only wish to share with good scene-friends like phonenumbers, IM info and addresses.
Just a sunday afternoon brainwave.
I thought this database already turned into that? I mean, it seems to me that adding info,files and so on isn't as important as staying friends with certain people round here? :-/ |
| |
The Shadow
Registered: Oct 2007
Posts: 304 |
Groepaz is right. The basic structure of the CSDb is wonderful as it is. There is no need to make radical changes to something that functions just fine. The framework itself will continue to improve and evolve. |
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5094 |
the tags function is ridiculously easy to implement, no need to change the structure whatsoever. could be done even through a 'parasite' 2nd site without changing csdb, or having any permission from perff.
ofcourse when the moderators' job is to clean up the DB after the users, they're against changes that will raise that job. We're having groepaz only as mod against it anyhow. his usual "WE think this and WE think that" stuff should be translated to "I". |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11384 |
Quote:We're having groepaz only as mod against it anyhow.
no you dont. feel free to ask any of the other mods. or maybe make a poll, maybe you can get about 1% of the active users to even bother reading it =P it's about 3 users that keep repeating the "tags tags tags" crap over and over, noone else gives a damn.
|
| |
jailbird
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1578 |
Yeah I still say that moderated tags would be fucking cool but I slowly tend to agree with Groepaz that with CSDb's current userbase it should/could never happen.
*sob*
|
| |
Mace
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799 |
Yeah... this discussion is really getting somewhere...
As usual.
Can't someone get something done?
Perhaps a professional policy should be set up for CSDb, stating in what direction development should go.
Either more database or more scene?
Focus on data or focus on networking?
History or present?
|
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11384 |
Quote:
The Goal:
To gather as much information as possible about the C64 scene. The sceners, the groups, the releases and events, and as much information about these as possible.
that said, the most active contributors to the database are the least active forum users. and generally those who complain most, submit little (as always there are exceptions). |
| |
TDJ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1879 |
I had a discussion with Sander about CSDb last saturday, and he proposed that the data in the database should be exposed so that other parties could use build new, specific sites, on top of it. I agree with him, as this would clear the way for lots of ideas which are simply not feasible within the current structure here. |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 - Next |
