| |
booker
Account closed
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 333 |
Mr. Rating Balancer - hello !
Mister :D Whoever (or whatever scripted) you are and scanning people's/prod's ratings and "voting" low, like 4 or 6 to keep those people/prods suddenly not appearing high on lists you are my hero and I love you. [ Just seen this "voting" again on Stinsen's rating page ].
C'mon, don't be shy, reveal yourself. :) |
|
... 56 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
booker
Account closed
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 333 |
Quoting Groepazsolution: ban the idiots that vote 1s =)
hehe it's not such a bad idea after all :) ban the troll voters from voting, but really, just proper code needed ;) |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11164 |
also ban everyone who complains about the votes :) |
| |
booker
Account closed
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 333 |
glad no ban to those who just ask for proper code =) [yet] |
| |
booker
Account closed
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 333 |
Quoting HCLOk.. now that both Uncensored and Comaland have left #1 in the top list, perhaps we can just bury this thread together with all the other anual rating system discussions and forget about it. I hate that i wasted 5 more minutes on it already.
Left where?
This weeks Sunday's nightly ratings are sponsored by numbers 4...and 6 :)
 |
| |
booker
Account closed
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 333 |
Okay okay, just kidding, that wasn't fair either. =)
 |
| |
jailbird
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1576 |
Booker, maybe it's news to you, but the votesystem's defects were obvious and known since CSDb is around. I remember threads from more than a decade ago, dealing with similar problems. Most of us who tried to change something in a positive way, gave up the fight a long time ago.
The sad fact is: most likely, no one will ever fix the votesystem.
So, it's you against the windmills. Just learn to deal with it gracefully. |
| |
null
Account closed
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 645 |
Also it doesn't fucking matter anyway. People are going to vote in ways you don't agree with. Whether the system is balanced, public, anonymous, whatever.
The best solution is to stop crying over imaginary internet points... unless you're just making demos so other people can vote them into the top, in which case I hope you enjoy your life. (: |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11164 |
Quote:People are going to vote in ways you don't agree with. Whether the system is balanced, public, anonymous, whatever.
yup. asking for opinion and consensus at the same time is a stupid idea to begin with. |
| |
Peacemaker
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 243 |
a fair voting system with entres that have less than 100s of votes? dream on =) |
| |
booker
Account closed
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 333 |
Quoting JailbirdBooker, maybe it's news to you, but the votesystem's defects were obvious and known since CSDb is around. I remember threads from more than a decade ago, dealing with similar problems. Most of us who tried to change something in a positive way, gave up the fight a long time ago.
The sad fact is: most likely, no one will ever fix the votesystem.
So, it's you against the windmills. Just learn to deal with it gracefully.
It's not a news to me, I remeber this.
Quote:
booker
Registered: Jul 2003
I'm not fighting with anything :) Just been a bit provocative here and brought the charts idea there and that's it. I'm done really. Thanks for your support JB.
@Knoeki, I have no idea how to answer to you, because you either don't read with proper attention, or don't understand what you are reading. I'll silent it out :)
Cheers
b. |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 - Next |
