| |
Scout
Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 1570 |
Handle id #17929 : Wreg
Quote:Trivia :
csdb moderator, was never part of the c64 scene.
Delete. |
|
... 13 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
wreg
Account closed
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 679 |
appearently that makes me a scener in yago's point of view...
otherwise i wouldn't have gotten this entry |
| |
assiduous
Account closed
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 343 |
wreg without a doubt is a scener,he's a sysop. and a very good sysop at that! |
| |
cba
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 935 |
Quote: wreg without a doubt is a scener,he's a sysop. and a very good sysop at that!
Oh tell me , from what board is this asshole a sysop ? |
| |
wreg
Account closed
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 679 |
niels, you asked me not to PM you, i will try to follow your wish
are you upset since my comments on your releases?
if it hurts you that much i can remove them, but try to see the other side, someone is releasing stuff, trying to pull it back after its put to the public...
this is not ok, so i tried to poke a bit there
anyway, just send another pm and i will censor myself there, no problem |
| |
Steppe
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 1510 |
You're confusing your very own peculiar collector's delusion with general scene ethics, it seems. If nobody cares about such mosquito crap but you (a bit of a changed scrolltext, come on, do a reality check!), why spam the comments with it?
Edit: Back then it wasn't possible to pull back and re-release a quick fix. But we're living in days of the interwebs, so why hold up that old rule just for the sake of preserving a tradition? Hope you get my drift. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386 |
i really didnt want to contribute to this thread, but this one got me:
Quote:
Edit: Back then it wasn't possible to pull back and re-release a quick fix. But we're living in days of the interwebs, so why hold up that old rule just for the sake of preserving a tradition? Hope you get my drift.
thing is that especially nowadays "crackers" love to point out how great things were in the past, and how behaviour from the past should be applied today ("delete the non sceners!", "ban the lamers!", "remove the crap releases!" ... blablabla). and last not least, one of their favourite hobbies seems to be to piss on each others releases, and point out how the others suck and fucked it up.
so, holding up the good old rule of "what is released is released" actually helps them and their game of competing with each other. if you don't like your fuckups pointed out, maybe simply put some more effort into testing your releases. if you don't like your silently-against-csdb-rules-updated releases undeleted, maybe don't choose csdb as your primary release platform. (try antidote maybe, lol)
interistingly, it's always the same groups who violate this rule, and then start whining about it. (preferably through trolling and complaining about moderators). maybe they should learn a bit from all the others who dont have that problem.
oh well *sigh* now i answered anyway. kill me. |
| |
assiduous
Account closed
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 343 |
Quote: Oh tell me , from what board is this asshole a sysop ?
CSDB message board obviously:) |
| |
dalezy
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 476 |
whatever you guys are on about, the only negative thing i remember is that wreg tried to belittle me about the way i used to name my work. nobody would listen when i voiced up, so why would this be a problem now? |
| |
cba
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 935 |
Quote: i really didnt want to contribute to this thread, but this one got me:
Quote:
Edit: Back then it wasn't possible to pull back and re-release a quick fix. But we're living in days of the interwebs, so why hold up that old rule just for the sake of preserving a tradition? Hope you get my drift.
thing is that especially nowadays "crackers" love to point out how great things were in the past, and how behaviour from the past should be applied today ("delete the non sceners!", "ban the lamers!", "remove the crap releases!" ... blablabla). and last not least, one of their favourite hobbies seems to be to piss on each others releases, and point out how the others suck and fucked it up.
so, holding up the good old rule of "what is released is released" actually helps them and their game of competing with each other. if you don't like your fuckups pointed out, maybe simply put some more effort into testing your releases. if you don't like your silently-against-csdb-rules-updated releases undeleted, maybe don't choose csdb as your primary release platform. (try antidote maybe, lol)
interistingly, it's always the same groups who violate this rule, and then start whining about it. (preferably through trolling and complaining about moderators). maybe they should learn a bit from all the others who dont have that problem.
oh well *sigh* now i answered anyway. kill me.
No groepaz we are not going to kill you, we will let you continue ruling csdb until the point that nobody really gives a fucking shit about this site any longer.
In fact from now one we should ignore csdb and just use Antidote.
|
| |
SECRET MAN
Account closed
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 336 |
I dont know what i can say.I hope that you guys can clear the things at X2008.
|
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 - Next |
