Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Discussions > Emulator checks are evil
2008-05-13 13:15
madcrow
Account closed

Registered: Oct 2003
Posts: 39
Emulator checks are evil

Seriously. I'm stuck in NTSC-land, so all this cool PAL stuff you Euros code is inaccessible to me on real hardware. When you add emulator checks/blocks, you keep "casual" fans who enjoy seeing C64 demos, but don't care to import a PAL '64 and monitor and associated high-end transformers to turn 110V/60Hz into 220V/50Hz from ever seeing cool stuff. So PLEASE ignore the advice in the emulator bugs document and keep on making no-check demos.
--------------------------------------
please have pity on the n00bish emu kiddie responsible for the post above.
 
... 33 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2008-05-13 15:29
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11360
Quote:

its intent was merely to annoy and discriminate against those lacking real PAL C64 hardware.


sorry to say so, but no. noone gives a damn about ntsc, demos are usually made for pal. and emufuxxor is there to annoy those using emulators.
2008-05-13 15:55
assiduous
Account closed

Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 343
well i cant recall any serious production protected with emufuxxor. i only know 2 really,Jeroen Kimmel Collection by Tropyx and Logosland2 by Draco. the community must have been really pissed off to miss out on these top quality productions when they came out,lol.

Demus interruptus and Krestage3 required that the particular VIC-II features necessary for the effects in these demos to look correctly are emulated. i guess that these demos wouldnt run on an NTSC machine anyway
2008-05-13 21:44
fade
Account closed

Registered: Mar 2002
Posts: 290
will ntsc for cards & bbs kthxbi :)
2008-05-13 21:59
Graham
Account closed

Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 990
Emu-detections only work on emulators which still lack emulation quality.
2008-05-13 23:22
assiduous
Account closed

Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 343
Quote: Emu-detections only work on emulators which still lack emulation quality.

speaking of the detection routines available now-very true. but if someone with solid coding skills was determined enough to devise a long lasting and effective way of detecting an emulator he would succeed. afew bizzare VIC-II effects i`ve seen arent emulated in any emulator in the world including Hoxs64. Rubi of Vice Team says that even the CPU6510 emulation is prone to failing on some test suites although I havent found any affected software yet so i cant confirm it.
2008-05-14 02:24
Oswald

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5086
what, there are still new VIC effects? bring them on.
2008-05-14 02:26
madcrow
Account closed

Registered: Oct 2003
Posts: 39
Quote: Quote:

its intent was merely to annoy and discriminate against those lacking real PAL C64 hardware.


sorry to say so, but no. noone gives a damn about ntsc, demos are usually made for pal. and emufuxxor is there to annoy those using emulators.


I know most demos only work on PAL. Thus, my comment/assumption that emulators are the only way for people in the NTSC part of the world to watch PAL demos without shelling out huge ammounts of money for hardware. (High-end transformers, shipping of equipment from Europe, etc)
--------------------------------------
please have pity on the n00bish emu kiddie responsible for the post above.
2008-05-14 07:36
WVL

Registered: Mar 2002
Posts: 899
Quote: what, there are still new VIC effects? bring them on.

Yes, there are some, but they're not really useful to make anything nice. At least, nothing that I could think of anyway :)

I could maybe add a small emulator test to the next demo based on one of those effects :)
2008-05-14 08:01
JackAsser

Registered: Jun 2002
Posts: 2014
I could release my EMU-checked based on the analog properties in the serial cable between the disk drive and the c64. It's really simple and would be quite hard to emulate because it would require the emulators to correctly emulate pull up and pull down time when driving the cables.

However it's just a curiosity and wouldn't lead to better emulation imo, just slower emulation so what the fuck...
2008-05-14 08:28
yago

Registered: May 2002
Posts: 333
The current emuchecks only check for bugs in the emu.

It would be much nicer, if the emulator tells "voluntary" about his settings, like framerate,sounddelay etc pp

The current emudetection-scheme which doesnt rely on bugs is very bad, because its in one of the io-areas, has way too few infos and is switched off by default on all emus.

If e.g. the hoxs+vice folks could come up with a new standard for that, these evil emulator checks would be much less evil.
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
Vg Vox/Voxvideogame
E$G/HF ⭐ 7
JEZ
macx
Apollyon/ALD
Andy/AEG
zscs
Guests online: 90
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
4 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
5 Mojo  (9.6)
6 The Demo Coder  (9.6)
7 What Is The Matrix 2  (9.6)
8 Uncensored  (9.6)
9 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
10 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.6)
5 Libertongo  (9.5)
6 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
7 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
8 Morph  (9.5)
9 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
10 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Performers  (9.3)
2 Booze Design  (9.3)
3 Oxyron  (9.3)
4 Nostalgia  (9.3)
5 Triad  (9.2)
Top Swappers
1 Derbyshire Ram  (10)
2 Jerry  (9.8)
3 Violator  (9.7)
4 Acidchild  (9.7)
5 Cash  (9.6)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.049 sec.