Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
 Welcome to our latest new user Harvey ! (Registered 2024-11-25) You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > C64 Productions > First raster split?
2010-07-05 20:55
Trap

Registered: Jul 2010
Posts: 223
First raster split?

Something that's been on my mind for years ... wonder if I will ever find the answer:

Who did the first real raster split? I did mine in 1987, but I don't think I was the first?

Trap Crap Wrap
 
... 26 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2010-07-07 16:10
tlr

Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1787
Perhaps ABC Crackings Raster Intro?
2010-07-08 04:52
SIDWAVE
Account closed

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2238
TLR: its not straight :D and not stable :D
2010-07-08 06:33
tlr

Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1787
Quote: TLR: its not straight :D and not stable :D

It's not straight but I'd say it's, from the viewers perspective, controlled in a stable manner.
It does use an unconventional technique though.
2010-07-08 11:27
JackAsser

Registered: Jun 2002
Posts: 2014
Simply setting $d020 every 63d cycle (or as often u like) will make a straight split (given the screen is turned off with $d011=0). Making the split not jump around each frame and making the split occur at the same x-position always is what is called a "Stable raster" which I'm sure Trap looks for.
2010-07-08 18:32
Trap

Registered: Jul 2010
Posts: 223
JackAsser got it right. I was looking for the first real vertical raster split.
2010-07-10 22:44
Turtle
Account closed

Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 70
Guess in some Anthony Crowther's gamethere was that test pattern like split after pressing restore, back in 1984.
2010-07-12 08:09
SIDWAVE
Account closed

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2238
Quote: Guess in some Anthony Crowther's gamethere was that test pattern like split after pressing restore, back in 1984.

Yes, in Gryphon
2010-07-12 19:40
4mat

Registered: May 2010
Posts: 65
think it's William Wobbler you press restore in. Gryphon's testcard is a bitmap. (press B)
2010-07-13 22:02
LocalH
Account closed

Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 10
IMO, "raster splits" are always "vertical" - since you're splitting the raster mid-line. Otherwise, standard rasterbars would be considered a split, and I don't think anyone with any knowledge whatsoever calls them that =P

Stability is also key, as has been mentioned - anyone can bung together a jittery split that slides around, it takes at least a little bit of skill to make it rock-solid.
2010-07-14 07:55
tlr

Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1787
The term "split" is used in early books (e.g Mapping the C64) to denote a mid-screen change of a video parameter by using the raster counter.
I'd say "raster split" is/was a fairly common term for usage of normal raster interrupts, especially in the early days.

Remember that there were loads of stuff done before there were any raster bars or vertical splits...
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
Alakran_64
grip
jmagic
Airwolf/F4CG
Darkflight
fegolhuzz
Matt
Higgie/Kraze/Slackers
Magic/Nah-Kolor
lotus_skylight
Guests online: 108
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
4 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
5 Mojo  (9.6)
6 The Demo Coder  (9.6)
7 What Is The Matrix 2  (9.6)
8 Uncensored  (9.6)
9 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
10 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.6)
5 Libertongo  (9.5)
6 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
7 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
8 Morph  (9.5)
9 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
10 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Performers  (9.3)
2 Booze Design  (9.3)
3 Oxyron  (9.3)
4 Nostalgia  (9.3)
5 Triad  (9.2)
Top Fullscreen Graphicians
1 Joe  (9.7)
2 Veto  (9.6)
3 Facet  (9.6)
4 The Sarge  (9.6)
5 Carrion  (9.5)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.039 sec.