Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
 Welcome to our latest new user jobj ! (Registered 2024-12-25) You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Entries > Handle id #8645 : Chris Huelsbeck
2007-08-24 05:08
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386
Handle id #8645 : Chris Huelsbeck

eh, why is he in the database? afaik he wasn't ever involved in the scene at all ?!
 
... 16 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2007-08-24 15:25
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386
my point is that NOT everyone belongs here so he can be credited. hubbard belongs here with no doubt, because he was active in the scene (just like ben daglish, and JT and a lot of other musicians) :)

as for chris i'm convinced now that he was involved in some scene production, so fine :) (i wonder though how i should find these in between the gazillion production which credits him for the ripped tunes)

and no steppe we didnt drop the topic. the unrelated commercial stuff must be whiped (and will be).
2007-08-24 15:39
Oswald

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5094
I just love our trigger happy moderators. once you have extra rights you just ought to use it, right ?
2007-08-24 15:58
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386
if you have to contribute something to the thread, do it. if not, don't. save yourself the energy of spilling random blubber into the forum, the damned nazi moderators will only delete it.
2007-08-24 19:07
Trazan
Account closed

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 620
Having stupid entries about Ku Klux Klan or such in a thread isnt really needed Oswald, no wonder I removed it.

...and what Groepaz said!
2007-08-24 19:49
CreaMD

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3057
What Trazan said. I think Groepaz's considerations are valid. I don't think we will start a big cleaning now. Only keep in mind when adding/editing entries if it belongs to the C64 Scene Database and if someone finds potential stuff not belonging there is always chance to discuss here.
2007-08-24 20:46
Steppe

Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 1510
Ok, point taken Groepaz, and on the whole I agree, sure. I honestly thought we were done with the topic of, let me call it "bystander scener entries". Maybe there's a way to flag them as such, I don't know.
2007-08-24 21:11
Zyron

Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 2381
The possibility to flag entries as "non-sceners" would be useful. Martin Galway f.ex. was never part of the scene, still I'd hate it to see him removed from CSDb. There are a bunch more of people like this, especially musicians... I personally think they have to stay here for several reasons, one of them being the possibility to give complete credits for releases with ripped music.
2007-08-24 21:15
Conrad

Registered: Nov 2006
Posts: 849
Down to it all, any release featuring certain musical scores needs to show proof of the author who composed it, and even though that Chris was not much of a scener according to groepaz, his profile (or at least his handle) needs to be here to show the proof.

I quite agree with Zyron's idea as well. Maybe that could be a new feature?
2007-08-24 21:31
Frantic

Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1648
I agree with Steppe/Zyron/crd. Such a flag would be useful. Another possibility would be to have a flag indicating whether the [something] that someone is credited for, in relation to a specific release, was intended for this specific release or not.

This would capture ripped music. It would ALSO capture cases such as loaders. If one looks at Krill's page here on CSDb for example, I think it looks a bit weird being credited in so many productions on an equal basis with true participating in the development of this production, and is hard to "navigate" in a sense close to the case with musicians being credited zillions of times for the same thing.

Dunno... Just a thought. On the other hand I guess that there are many cases where it is impossible to know, since it is so long ago and much info is lost, whether some piece of music really was intended for this or that production and so on. So, in the end I guess that's a bad idea. :)
2007-08-24 22:19
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386
flagging such entries somehow sounds good to me, and also what frantic says, i dont like the credits for loaders a lot either =P

however, i don't agree with "they must stay so we can give proper credits". ultimativly that would mean that everyone who ever did something commercially for the c64 has to be added, because at some point a scener ripped his music/sprites/charset/gfx/whatever.
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
REBEL 1/HF
trident
Case/Padua
Didi/Laxity
Mojzesh/TGR🇬🇧
DJ Gruby/TRiAD
Guests online: 92
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Mojo  (9.7)
4 Coma Light 13  (9.6)
5 The Demo Coder  (9.6)
6 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
7 What Is The Matrix 2  (9.6)
8 Uncensored  (9.6)
9 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
10 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
3 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.6)
5 X-Mas Demo 2024  (9.5)
6 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
7 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
8 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
9 Morph  (9.5)
10 Libertongo  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Performers  (9.3)
2 Booze Design  (9.3)
3 Oxyron  (9.3)
4 Censor Design  (9.3)
5 Triad  (9.3)
Top NTSC-Fixers
1 Pudwerx  (10)
2 Booze  (9.7)
3 Stormbringer  (9.7)
4 Fungus  (9.7)
5 Grim Reaper  (9.3)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.052 sec.