Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > C64 Composing > SDI 2.0 Beta
2006-02-21 18:17
6R6

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 245
SDI 2.0 Beta

Hi.
A working preview here:
http://home.eunet.no/~ggallefo/sdi/

Report your bugs and thoughts here:

GRG
 
... 195 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2009-08-01 23:01
Stainless Steel

Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 966
huh ? actually you need to set filter and bandpass/resonance in the instrument setup to have the 4th channel effect that instrument.
2009-08-02 00:17
booker

Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 334
Quote: huh ? actually you need to set filter and bandpass/resonance in the instrument setup to have the 4th channel effect that instrument.


Em, nope. You need FLT program set in instrument though. (perchaps this can be overwritten witch 2x command, haven't checked)

If you use 6x on 4ch channel then the FLT band set in instrument is ignored. Either if it's 00 or otherwise.

If you use 7x then for packed tune it's important to start with command 70 on 4ch channel otherwise it won't work (works in editor though)



@Geir, do you plan to controll resonance with SDI v3 on 4th channel?
2009-08-02 08:27
Stainless Steel

Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 966
Well, activating just the filter for the instrument might suffice for 4th channel control, i just set both out of habbit.
2009-08-10 20:18
booker

Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 334
Quoting Stainles Steel
Quoting Linus
Don't get me wrong, I am not throwing bricks at anybody, but saying it's rock science is just bullshit. The sid *is* simple compared to more sophisticated synths


My friend, from your point of view that may hold true.
But then again, if it's no rocket science - why doesnt everybody's instruments sound as polished as yours or Jeff's f.ex. ?

Painless, I'll tell you how Linus's and Jeff's instruments sound so polished - they're spending a hell knows what deal of time trying to beat the shit out of the SID.
That's the "why?".


BTW. SDI 2b7 bugreport: the WF repeat doesn't work at all. Ie. the example below doesn't play as should:

Quote:
WF REPEAT command (FA):
Must be used together with the jump command.
FA XX
XX = 01-7f

Tells the player to repeat
the following FF jump XX times.
When the last FF jump is executed
the player automatically jumps to the line
below the FF command.

Example:

00:FA 08 ;repeat 8 times
01:09 00
02:81 ce
03:41 a7
04:41 a5
05:41 a2
06:FF 01
07:21 00 ;ends here after the repeats.
08:FF 07

The FA command can be used together with all
the other waveform commands.


Regards
2009-08-11 12:52
GT
Account closed

Registered: Sep 2008
Posts: 308
The FA command should be put after 09 00 (the init waveform), then the FF command should be FF 02 in this example.

Regarding your RETURN / SHIFT+RETURN Loop function on subtunes, I don't know. Has always worked for me.
2009-08-11 14:28
Stainless Steel

Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 966
Quoting Booker
Painless, I'll tell you how Linus's and Jeff's instruments sound so polished - they're spending a hell knows what deal of time trying to beat the shit out of the SID.
That's the "why?".
So basically what you're saying is, I'm not spending shit on working on my instruments? Hmm.
2009-08-11 16:28
booker

Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 334
Quote: Quoting Booker
Painless, I'll tell you how Linus's and Jeff's instruments sound so polished - they're spending a hell knows what deal of time trying to beat the shit out of the SID.
That's the "why?".
So basically what you're saying is, I'm not spending shit on working on my instruments? Hmm.


Basically I'm saying, to get the sounds we all have to work on them. There's no other 'secret' ;-)

This wasn't a comment on your instruments/whatsoever :)
2009-08-12 06:53
SIDWAVE
Account closed

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2238
I dont see what you a whining about Stainless.
Your sounds are quite in the better league.
2009-08-12 08:39
Stainless Steel

Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 966
Though i dont totally agree, nevermind my ranting. It's probably just PMS.
2009-08-12 09:07
Jammer

Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 1336
booker >> i wouldn't agree on the time put into instruments ;) i'd rather consider imagination and experience with sound clusters, modulation results and so on ;)
Previous - 1 | ... | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | ... | 21 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
Brataccas/HF
Mixer
zscs
csabanw
Luca/FIRE
Guests online: 94
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Mojo  (9.7)
4 Coma Light 13  (9.6)
5 The Demo Coder  (9.6)
6 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
7 What Is The Matrix 2  (9.6)
8 Uncensored  (9.6)
9 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
10 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
3 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
4 X-Mas Demo 2024  (9.6)
5 Copper Booze  (9.6)
6 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
7 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
8 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
9 Morph  (9.5)
10 Libertongo  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Booze Design  (9.3)
2 Oxyron  (9.3)
3 Performers  (9.3)
4 Censor Design  (9.3)
5 Triad  (9.3)
Top Crackers
1 Mr. Z  (9.9)
2 Antitrack  (9.8)
3 OTD  (9.8)
4 Fungus  (9.8)
5 S!R  (9.8)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.058 sec.