| |
dalezy
Registered: Apr 2002 Posts: 476 |
Handle id #2455 : Commodore
wtf. |
|
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001 Posts: 11386 |
wuahahahahahahaha
who had that splendid idea? lmao
|
| |
carlsson
Registered: Nov 2002 Posts: 41 |
If a production would make extensive calls into Basic or Kernel ROMs, should Commodore also be credited for coding? Or if the standard loading routines are used, of course Commodore made the loader. Wow. |
| |
Slator
Registered: Jan 2002 Posts: 274 |
lol, and even if you think that nothing will ever get that low then you find stuff like this. I would like to see the most pressed key credit or most loaded track/sector....
haha, how low can you go ? :D |
| |
Graham Account closed
Registered: Dec 2002 Posts: 990 |
most loaded track/sector? that would be track 18, sector 1 |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001 Posts: 11386 |
graham: the question is, who gets credit for it??? |
| |
hollowman
Registered: Dec 2001 Posts: 474 |
Quote: graham: the question is, who gets credit for it???
cbmhardware ? but then the oceanic drives dont get credit.. |
| |
carlsson
Registered: Nov 2002 Posts: 41 |
Don't forget the disk manufacturer - Maxell, 3M, SKC etc - which of course should be credited too, at least if one specific brand was selected for official distribution. No, I'm not serious. |
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002 Posts: 5094 |
...and how can I credit for making me, my mom and dad ? |
| |
Graham Account closed
Registered: Dec 2002 Posts: 990 |
what about credits to the guy who coded the $E544 clear screen routine? |
| |
Nafcom
Registered: Apr 2002 Posts: 588 |
I think it's ok like it is as long as it's only used for Char credits. So that's the way like it is used now, and that is ok.
Ok ok ok :) |
| |
Scout
Registered: Dec 2002 Posts: 1570 |
Well...?
*looks at the moderators* |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001 Posts: 11386 |
i deleted it.
btw, it wasnt locked...so, in a totally undisputable clear case like this... go ahead, just do it (tm) =) |
| |
Scout
Registered: Dec 2002 Posts: 1570 |
Ah, cheers! |