| |
Tim
Account closed
Registered: Mar 2002
Posts: 467 |
Release id #5085 : XFR
ok, so it's a wellknown 'secret' that this demo was made by reflex, but technically speaking.. isn't this a wrong entry? I we add fake groups and correctly credit those, shouldn't we do the same with a 'fake demo' like this? |
|
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386 |
yes indeed. there should be a seperate entry for the "group" with a link in trivia field to reflex.
just like it has been done with Tough
....do it! :) |
| |
Rough
Account closed
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1829 |
Same would go for 20KB-Demo then, which was released under Ispel.
Maybe those demos should be credited for both groups, the real and the fake, whatcha think? |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386 |
no, a "fake" group is just about as real as any other group. if its related to another group, put that info into trivia. (and releases should be credited to whatever group is mentioned in the actual release) |
| |
Rough
Account closed
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1829 |
I ask myself the question if turnabouting the group name just because more than one entry by a group at a party isn't allowed is already a fake group. |
| |
Graham
Account closed
Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 990 |
Brings back memories of Lemon, Nemol, Melon etc |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386 |
doesnt really matter imho, if a release is credited to another group, then that other group should get an entry. crediting another group would simply be wrong, even if the other group happens to consist of the same people :) |
| |
Tim
Account closed
Registered: Mar 2002
Posts: 467 |
yes, i was kind of affraid you would say exactly that.
ok.. on my to-do list |
