Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
 Welcome to our latest new user danikAdmiral ! (Registered 2024-12-17) You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Feedback > Commercial Game laws
2002-08-19 22:10
Celtic
Administrator

Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 807
Commercial Game laws

Alright after much debate within the NoName team we came up with some laws concerning the Commercial games in the csdb.

Releases:
law #1 : game must have scene related creators, or atleast one

Creators:

law#2: a non scener can be enterred into the database, only to credit him for his ripped material being used by others in scene productions such demos, mags, intros, etc.

law#3: the non scener mentioned in law#2 cannot have his or her games in the csdb, since these are not 'scene related

Well, i guess this should explain it a little bit. For further questions write them down here.
The CSDB team will now slowly adress every game enterred here, and remove when necessary (God what a task.. bah:).

So feel free to comment...
 
... 7 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2002-08-21 14:50
TDJ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1879
Delete Radwar, what have they ever done for the scene?

*runs away*
2002-08-21 15:03
Seven

Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 202
TDJ: it's funny, isn't it? when you ask people nowadays, all they can tell you is that Radwar organized some more or less commercial parties ;)

either way, one more thing about this topic...

I'd rather see "professionals" added to the database and credited for their work, than "remixes" with only the names of a guy who changed a color of a sprite, moved a level block, added a more compatible loader system or made it work for Super-CPU (did I mention that I still think that Super-CPU machines are no C64 in my set of definition? =)), claiming "idea, graphics, code and concept" for himself.
2003-10-12 16:54
MwS_RadwaR

Registered: Oct 2003
Posts: 11
Quote: TDJ: it's funny, isn't it? when you ask people nowadays, all they can tell you is that Radwar organized some more or less commercial parties ;)

either way, one more thing about this topic...

I'd rather see "professionals" added to the database and credited for their work, than "remixes" with only the names of a guy who changed a color of a sprite, moved a level block, added a more compatible loader system or made it work for Super-CPU (did I mention that I still think that Super-CPU machines are no C64 in my set of definition? =)), claiming "idea, graphics, code and concept" for himself.


@TDJ:

It depends on what scene you mean ..

but i don't really care about what you really mean,
history tells it's own story.

-mws
2003-10-12 19:02
MorGorr
Account closed

Registered: May 2002
Posts: 47
All those "laws" only make sense if you define what exactly is a "scener". I briefly checked the docs section, but couldn't find any definition.
2003-10-12 19:20
cadaver

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1160
I won't argue about possible ideological issues but for the purpose of those "laws", I think "one who has worked on noncommercial C64-production(s) that have been released through some noncommercial distribution channel" is good enough.
2003-10-13 06:22
Puterman
Account closed

Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 188
For the purposes of this site, people who have been involved in the C-64 demo and/or cracking scene are "sceners". Easy as that.
2003-10-13 08:22
TDJ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1879
@MWS: don't worry, I recognize the role of Radwar for the c64 scene, I was part of it too when you guys were around (my previous post was meant as a joke).

But at the same time I also realize that role is not as big as you guys sometimes would like to make it seem .. there has been plenty of scene-activity going on after you left, you know ..
2003-10-13 17:39
Richard

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 621
I agree with Puterman's last comment regarding this subject :)
2003-10-15 16:55
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11384
"I won't argue about possible ideological issues but for the purpose of those "laws", I think "one who has worked on noncommercial C64-production(s) that have been released through some noncommercial distribution channel" is good enough."

manfred trenz has released "funpaint II" through 64er magazine for that matter.... not quite "non commercial" though :)
2003-10-15 22:31
cadaver

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1160
Mmhh yes, I thought about lamers :D releasing something through C64 magazines when I formulated that "rule" not depending on definition of "Scene", and yeah, ultimately a magazine such as 64'er isn't noncommercial form of distribution IMO, so I consider my ass covered :)
Previous - 1 | 2 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
Ghost/Quantum
ΛΛdZ
wil
Acidchild/Padua
Jazzcat/Onslaught
Linus/MSL
LordNikon/Dekadence
LightSide
katon/Lepsi De
Guests online: 101
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Mojo  (9.6)
4 Coma Light 13  (9.6)
5 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
6 What Is The Matrix 2  (9.6)
7 The Demo Coder  (9.6)
8 Uncensored  (9.6)
9 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
10 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.6)
5 No Listen  (9.6)
6 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
7 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
8 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
9 Morph  (9.5)
10 Libertongo  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Performers  (9.3)
2 Booze Design  (9.3)
3 Oxyron  (9.3)
4 Triad  (9.3)
5 Censor Design  (9.3)
Top Webmasters
1 Slaygon  (9.6)
2 Perff  (9.6)
3 Sabbi  (9.5)
4 Morpheus  (9.4)
5 CreaMD  (9.1)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.098 sec.