| |
Mace
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799 |
BBS Graphics
Interesting to see that, while we have a separate release type for it, there are NOT releases of BBS Graphics in CSDB...
There were two, but those turned out to be cracks that were wrongly labeled.
Both by the same person, btw... but I digress. |
|
| |
Jammer
Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 1334 |
besides, it would be practically the same as petscii, i guess ;] |
| |
Mace
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799 |
Yeah... I vote for removal of the category. |
| |
Sander
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 493 |
Quote: Yeah... I vote for removal of the category.
I disagree.. PETSCII graphcis are not neccesarily BBS graphics.
But i'd wait for Jucke or Frantic to hear their view on this. |
| |
daison
Registered: May 2005
Posts: 90 |
But there isn't a PETSCII Graphics category either right?
(At least, I couldn't find it in the advanced search...) |
| |
Zyron
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 2381 |
BBS Graphics is the category to use when uploading BBS logs/graphics/screens, obviously nobody have done that yet.
PETSCII is a graphics type to use with the C64 Graphics category, other types are FLI, Multicolour etc. |
| |
Mace
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799 |
There are BBS Graphicians in the database, but none have releases...
What is the file format for BBS Graphics?
I mean... as soon as you make an executable file of it, you could call it PETSCII, right?
Or are BBS Graphics those weird SEQ-file releases I can't seem to locate in CSDb right now?
@ daison: you can't search for PETSCII graphics, as they are a subtype of 'Graphics' and you can't search for subtypes. |
| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1641 |
My opinion? Well... Uh.. Since there aren't that many entries of those two kinds anyway, perhaps the "PETSCII" label is sufficient? |
