Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
 Welcome to our latest new user AndyAsth ! (Registered 2017-10-16) You are not logged in 
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Entries > Event id #2636 : Crack Intro Music Competition 2017
2017-09-29 15:46
Didi

Registered: Nov 2011
Posts: 245
Event id #2636 : Crack Intro Music Competition 2017

After the geat success in 2013, the time has come for another Crack Intro Music Competition!

Several people have asked for it and finally it happens.

This time I have a skilled co-organizer with Jammer.

Competition runs from September 29, 2017, until October 29, 2017. So you have a full month to deliver your creations.

Please use this thread for questions, discussion and everything else concerning this competition.

THE RULES (same as in 2013, worked very well):
- max. playtime 1:00 min. (PAL playing speed), then repeat or fade.
- max. size: $1000 bytes (preferably located in memory at $1000-$2000)
- single speed only
- no SID model preference (should sound good on all SID models)
- must be handed in as executable format .sid or .prg (might be embedded in .t64 or .d64)
- no graphics or even intro-like presentation is allowed to be included.
- Productions using the music might be released after the voting deadline. The voting should be focused on the music itself.
- the participating musics may not have been released or used in a public production before.
- multiple entries per musician allowed.

Deadline for entry submission is October 29, 2017 at 23:59:59 (11:59:59 pm).
Voting closes one week later at November 6, 2017 at 23:59:59 (11:59:59 pm).
Voting platform is CSDb (with all disadvantages it may have), therefore entries have to be posted here.
Entries will be ranked by weighted average of CSDb votes. Entries with the same weighted average are ranked by their percentages of 10s, 9s, etc.

No prices to win, just the fame. May the best creation win!
 
... 80 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2017-09-30 11:56
TheRyk

Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 407
Cool that you do this compo.
Not gonna take part, but probably rather leave this to real musicians.
Not so happy about 1:00 limit, i.e. what Scarzix sez.
2017-09-30 12:12
Linus

Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 568
Really great you guys are organizing another Crack Intro Music competition! Awesome.

I am struggling with this rule, tho:

- no SID model preference (should sound good on all SID models)

May I ask what the point is?

First of all most of the classic crack intro tunes from back in the days sound like shit on a 8580, so it's not a way to keep things "real" - heavy differences have always been there.

Also, I don't see a proper scientific, ahem, way to judge whether a tune complies to that rule or not. An 8580 tune that sounds muffled on the old chip can be excused by the author's soft spot for lo-fi glitch, e.g. I am exaggerating here, obviously, but I hope you get my drift. Who judges what's "good" and what's not? Oh, yeah, the organizers, sure - but how can a participant possibly know what's in the realm of acceptable according to the organizer's taste? It's a very vague, nebulous rule one could easily do without imho.

That being said, I am looking forward to an ass kicking compo! Thanks, guys!
2017-09-30 13:44
Jammer

Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 670
Sascha, I'm more than sure your great experience will allow you to tell tune sounding lofi on 6581 from the broken one ;) Same for the other way round - 6581 tune sounding thin on new one is rather common and acceptable but 6581 bassline using $00 cutoff, which in most cases is virtually inaudible on 8580, is not that nice.
2017-09-30 15:23
Linus

Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 568
What about switching filtertypes? Produces clicks on the old fella, but does that automatically result in a disqualification? Where to draw the line?
2017-09-30 15:51
uctumi

Registered: Jun 2015
Posts: 1
Will the voting be anonymous? How will the voting method be?
2017-09-30 15:59
Jammer

Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 670
"Voting platform is CSDb (with all disadvantages it may have), therefore entries have to be posted here.
Entries will be ranked by weighted average of CSDb votes. Entries with the same weighted average are ranked by their percentages of 10s, 9s, etc."

You just vote like for regular csdb releases :)
2017-09-30 16:47
spider-j

Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 127
What Scarzix said. Please make it at least +10 seconds!
For a real intro tune small size is what matters anyway.
2017-09-30 16:48
Groepaz

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 8208
or cut the size in half and drop the length limit :)
2017-09-30 16:55
Jammer

Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 670
Put down your weapon, you have 20 seconds to comply.

If tune cannot deliver anything interesting below 1 minute, it's going to suck as crack music anyway. It's that simple ;)
2017-09-30 18:09
Linus

Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 568
So what about filtertype switching then? :) Serious question.
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
mwr
Disk_mizer
Romppainen/ΤRIΛD
Stein/Prosonix/Offence
redcrab/G★P
Guests online: 50
Top Demos
1 Uncensored  (9.7)
2 Edge of Disgrace  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.6)
4 The Shores of Reflec..  (9.6)
5 Lunatico  (9.6)
6 Quad Core 100%  (9.5)
7 Comaland 100%  (9.5)
8 Incoherent Nightmare  (9.5)
9 Wonderland XII  (9.5)
10 Comaland  (9.5)
Top onefile Demos
1 Pandemoniac Part 2 o..  (9.6)
2 Synthesis  (9.6)
3 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
4 Daah, Those Acid Pil..  (9.5)
5 Field Sort  (9.4)
6 Treu Love [reu]  (9.4)
7 Dawnfall  (9.3)
8 KAOS 64  (9.3)
9 Veterans of Style  (9.2)
10 One-Der  (9.2)
Top Groups
1 Booze Design  (9.4)
2 Censor Design  (9.4)
3 Oxyron  (9.4)
4 Crest  (9.3)
5 Finnish Gold  (9.3)
Top Original Suppliers
1 Derbyshire Ram  (9.3)
2 hedning  (9.2)
3 Jazzcat  (9.1)
4 Irata  (9.0)
5 Fungus  (9.0)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2017
Page generated in: 0.416 sec.