| |
angelo
Registered: Jul 2024
Posts: 13 |
C64 Charts
Hey, so I'm trying to simplify categories for my research a little bit to be able to at least try to draw a line between demoscene and crackerscene. Obviously I didn't watch all the 1414 productions classified as C64 Charts. That'd be a little too much at this point. I watched few of them, and to my best knowledge, stand-alone productions with charts would be more of a crackerscene thing.
So the question would be: Does anyone know, if there are C64 Charts prods that include any demoscene charts. Or C64 Charts that'd be half-way there, i.e. included charts for cracks, cracktros and demos - something that could be considered demoscenish.
Thanks in advance :) |
|
... 10 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Mixer
Registered: Apr 2008
Posts: 447 |
[/quote]So what data would you have in mind, when you say that? How would it be organized, what metadata it might have to be able to tell whether something was more crackscene or demoscene, without presets? Asking out of genuine curiosity.[/quote]
I can see that you're collecting data. I think that you're correct that the place to look is in the productions that people did. All www collections and commentary came later. In my opinion the terms crack scene and demo scene did not exist mid 80's and emerged much later. |
| |
angelo
Registered: Jul 2024
Posts: 13 |
Quoting KrillPretty sure the categories themselves were established rather quickly, though.
interestingly enough, reading through the threads you gave me I found this thesis:
Quoting hedningWith the Amiga and Atari ST everything obviously had to be autistically sorted into horrible terms like dentro, cracktro, trackmo whatever. :D
This might be actually a lower-hanging fruit, looking at different charts to see how each platform formed categories. Even if done manually, without an over-engineered OCRin AI :) |
| |
Krill
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2969 |
Quoting angeloWell, I was kind of thinking of a different analysis -- even just for kicks -- to see across the years what people appeared on charts, and what groups, and which categories, and maybe even do a simple popularity summary :) Ah, finding the presence or absence of some "discipline overlap" within groups or the scene would certainly be a finding. =)
Quoting angeloQuoting hedningWith the Amiga and Atari ST everything obviously had to be autistically sorted into horrible terms like dentro, cracktro, trackmo whatever. :D This might be actually a lower-hanging fruit, looking at different charts to see how each platform formed categories. Even if done manually, without an over-engineered OCRin AI :) Oh, you're about categories of productions? This might give some insight, but keep in mind that the 16-bit platforms appeared after any kind of "scene" was a thing.
Also "best demo" and whatnot (as opposed to ranking individuals) wasn't a thing in the mags, iirc, but only came later with automated statistics on database-backed websites. |
| |
Jetboy
Registered: Jul 2006
Posts: 299 |
Quoting KrillAlso "best demo" and whatnot (as opposed to ranking individuals) wasn't a thing in the mags, iirc, but only came later with automated statistics on database-backed websites.
There were charts in scene mags, when swapping we were sending votesheets that were then used to compile those charts, buts due to limited distribution, and low number of entries those charts were not very reliable. |
| |
bugjam
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 2583 |
The "charts" releases I know are purely personal charts of swappers, independent of legal vs illegal scene. |
| |
ws
Registered: Apr 2012
Posts: 251 |
Also, enjoy including and cross-referencing socalled "rankings" in your research :-) Ranking (no idea what logic they are based on, but there are quite a few of those) |
| |
angelo
Registered: Jul 2024
Posts: 13 |
Quoting bugjamThe "charts" releases I know are purely personal charts of swappers, independent of legal vs illegal scene.
That's very insightful and valuable. Thank you. |
| |
angelo
Registered: Jul 2024
Posts: 13 |
Quoting wsAlso, enjoy including and cross-referencing socalled "rankings" in your research :-) Ranking (no idea what logic they are based on, but there are quite a few of those)
interesting. especially it's tagged as regular demo, so it'd be easy to miss that one. |
| Previous - 1 | 2 - Next |
