Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
 Welcome to our latest new user Rodrigo Yeowtch ! (Registered 2024-11-24) You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Questions > Why is editing/deleting old comments enabled?
2008-01-10 11:56
jailbird

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1578
Why is editing/deleting old comments enabled?

Noticed a few times when deletion/editing of old comments resulted quite funny/annoying/baffling comment-threads.
Is there a special reason for this being enabled?
2008-01-10 12:26
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11352
i have been wondering that myself numerous times aswell. it sucks.
2008-01-10 12:29
TDJ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1879
Well, sometimes a comment I make has a short 'lifespan' (a question or sth) so in those cases it's always nice if it can be deleted.
2008-01-10 12:32
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11352
sure, sometimes it has legit uses. however the potential for abuse and confusion is much higher.
2008-01-10 13:19
Perff
Administrator

Posts: 1677
The main reason was that when we first made CSDb comments was supposed to be single personal oppinions about that entry. It wasn't supposed to be used for questions or discussions, but that is what happened.
So editing and deleting comments shouldn't have a big influence as comments wasn't supposed to be connected in any way, and one might change his mind about an entry, so..

But now that the comments are more (to my disliking) used as a tiny discussion forum for each entry, you are right that editing/deleting makes little sense.

So I guess I must give up in the hope that comments are used the way they should be, and remove the edit/delete feature?
2008-01-10 13:32
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11352
personally i'd merge the "comments" and "discuss this entry" feature.
2008-01-10 14:05
Oswald

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5086
Quote: The main reason was that when we first made CSDb comments was supposed to be single personal oppinions about that entry. It wasn't supposed to be used for questions or discussions, but that is what happened.
So editing and deleting comments shouldn't have a big influence as comments wasn't supposed to be connected in any way, and one might change his mind about an entry, so..

But now that the comments are more (to my disliking) used as a tiny discussion forum for each entry, you are right that editing/deleting makes little sense.

So I guess I must give up in the hope that comments are used the way they should be, and remove the edit/delete feature?


how about only allowing one comment per person per release.
2008-01-10 14:56
jailbird

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1578
TDJ: hmm, perhaps you could place your temporary questions to the "Production Notes" area (and leave this page editable)?

Quoting Oswaldbogár
how about only allowing one comment per person per release.

That will probably lead to a lot of frustration :)

I still think the best way is to disable the feature. Or to merge it with the forum, as Groepaz suggested.
2008-01-10 15:36
Burglar

Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 1085
Quote:
how about only allowing one comment per person per release.


Quote:
That will probably lead to a lot of frustration :)


yes. but good frustration (ie: "I cant have a discussion in the comments when I can only comment once!")

I'm not in favor of disabling stuff right away just because a few ppl abuse something.
2008-01-10 15:50
saehn
Account closed

Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 44
Quote: The main reason was that when we first made CSDb comments was supposed to be single personal oppinions about that entry. It wasn't supposed to be used for questions or discussions, but that is what happened.
So editing and deleting comments shouldn't have a big influence as comments wasn't supposed to be connected in any way, and one might change his mind about an entry, so..

But now that the comments are more (to my disliking) used as a tiny discussion forum for each entry, you are right that editing/deleting makes little sense.

So I guess I must give up in the hope that comments are used the way they should be, and remove the edit/delete feature?


A communication system should meet user requirements... the users shouldn't have to meet system requirements ;).

People seem to like communicating via this method. If edits are disabled, the potential for abuse goes down and the database maintains historic integrity. If someone wants to "revise" a previous statement, that can easily be accomplished via a follow-up comment.

2008-01-10 15:53
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11352
Quote:

If someone wants to "revise" a previous statement, that can easily be accomplished via a follow-up comment.


exactly. letting users edit past statements is an invitation for various malicious things.
 
... 34 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
REBEL 1/HF
Hydrogen/Glance
Magic/Nah-Kolor
EALL/HT
Peacemaker/CENSOR/Hi..
Fresh
rexbeng
zscs
iAN CooG/HVSC
MCM/ONSLAUGHT
bexxx
WVL/Xenon
v3nt0r/ibex-crew
Electric/Extend
Flashback
Jetboy/Elysium
Bieno/Commodore Plus
TPM/Silicon Ltd
Wayne Kerr/Flashtro
Grue/Extend
psych
Guests online: 123
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
4 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
5 Mojo  (9.6)
6 Uncensored  (9.6)
7 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
8 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
9 What Is The Matrix 2  (9.6)
10 No Bounds  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.6)
5 Libertongo  (9.5)
6 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
7 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
8 Morph  (9.5)
9 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
10 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Performers  (9.3)
2 Booze Design  (9.3)
3 Oxyron  (9.3)
4 Nostalgia  (9.3)
5 Censor Design  (9.3)
Top Graphicians
1 Mirage  (9.7)
2 Archmage  (9.7)
3 Mikael  (9.6)
4 Carrion  (9.6)
5 Sulevi  (9.6)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.06 sec.