| |
Krill
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2980 |
Release id #248155 : Hiking Home for Christmas
Drama posts go here: |
|
... 128 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
TheRyk
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 2244 |
Quoting 4gentE...
Although I saw certain someone getting kinda dramatic over the use of the word "demomaker". ;-)
...
Don't you worry, Sherlock Zero will track them all down!
BTT :) |
| |
Burglar
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 1101 |
Quoting TheRykAbout cracking: Is it bad if someone uses a disassembler or VICE Mon? I don't think so.
cracking with vice mon is lame, it's much easier with breakpoints and full memory access (incl stack, zp, cia timers, nmi, etc etc) than doing it on the real thing with just a cartridge. |
| |
Krill
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2980 |
Quoting BurglarQuoting TheRykAbout cracking: Is it bad if someone uses a disassembler or VICE Mon? I don't think so.
cracking with vice mon is lame, it's much easier with breakpoints and full memory access (incl stack, zp, cia timers, nmi, etc etc) than doing it on the real thing with just a cartridge. Joke's on the copy protection allowing for an easy-to-image disk, then! :) |
| |
Peacemaker
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 275 |
Quote: Quoting TheRykAbout cracking: Is it bad if someone uses a disassembler or VICE Mon? I don't think so.
cracking with vice mon is lame, it's much easier with breakpoints and full memory access (incl stack, zp, cia timers, nmi, etc etc) than doing it on the real thing with just a cartridge.
you are right. same with ntsc / pal fixing.
its way much easier than it used to be in the 80s / 90s. |
| |
Burglar
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 1101 |
Quoting Peacemakeryou are right. same with ntsc / pal fixing.
its way much easier than it used to be in the 80s / 90s. everything is much easier :)
and now we have this damn AI that makes everything too easy! :P |
| |
CopAss
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 21 |
Quote: Quoting CopAssThey must have "good" reasons for hiding the creating process.
Those who are honest won't make a problem out of it.
It probably has to do with the accusations w/o proof you post in many threads, the swear words and general awful behavior.
And then you expect everybody to dance to your tune. LOL
The words I quoted from you are a perfect example, you basically claim that everybody who does not answer to your demands is dishonest. But you forget nobody has any obligation to answer to you.
The way you and a very small amount of others keep screaming, keep misbehaving and keep destroying every thread about graphics is very off-putting and very far from general scene ethics.
You need to learn how to bring your ideas without blame and attacks and without virtue signalling. You'll be much more effective this way.
@Burglar: what kind of ethics are you talking about?! wtf?!:D
These are facts: everyone knows, has seen, and it has been proven that they are cheating.
Yet nothing happens, because "art is free" and then everything is fine!:D
But apart from the fact that it "appears" that these are made from AI generated images, it can now be detected with very good efficiency.
This is the most accurate one at the moment: https://sightengine.com/detect-ai-generated-images
Yeah, and then we call this evidence. It's free, you can try it.
The result will be quite surprising.
https://ibb.co/Gxm55Ps
 |
| |
Shine
Registered: Jul 2012
Posts: 369 |
@ CopAss
Interesting (a bit at least)...
You could test the graphics here aswell, because they are 100% AI Converts iirc:
Matt |
| |
Peacemaker
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 275 |
Quote: @Burglar: what kind of ethics are you talking about?! wtf?!:D
These are facts: everyone knows, has seen, and it has been proven that they are cheating.
Yet nothing happens, because "art is free" and then everything is fine!:D
But apart from the fact that it "appears" that these are made from AI generated images, it can now be detected with very good efficiency.
This is the most accurate one at the moment: https://sightengine.com/detect-ai-generated-images
Yeah, and then we call this evidence. It's free, you can try it.
The result will be quite surprising.
https://ibb.co/Gxm55Ps
forget this crap already.i tested such GREAT AIs and the results are not acurate. |
| |
4gentE
Registered: Mar 2021
Posts: 285 |
@Peacemaker
I’m sceptical about these things too. I haven’t been playing a lot with this one. However. I’ve seen quite a lot of false negatives (just try some from wired AI ninja compo). I guess C64 treatment messes up the trail. Not one false positive. So, when this toy shows something like 80% positive on a C64 picture, I believe it’s AI allright (try Ramsay’s pics Matt released). |
| |
CopAss
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 21 |
not 100%, but it convincingly hits the AI.
I'd be interested to see what kind of images he said it wasn't AI.
 |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 - Next |
