| |
Hermit
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 208 |
Ideas for a NEW TRACKER
Hi, Guyz
I have the same problem as others have nowadays in this fast industrial world: Not too much of FreeTime...
I only would like to compose SID music, leave the programming & gfx.
Only one problem is still in my way: Need for a reliable, full featured music editor.
There are a lot of great tools, I think the best are: XSID, SDI, JCH, SID-Factory, DMC5, Goattracker, (BullSID coming?)
I made a lot of comparisons among them, and Goattracker get the most point in regards of functionality (but not in all).
I like the tracker, but don't like emulated sound. Through
PC64 cable or HardSID you can use real SID, but just under the buggy Windows. I don't know about Linux drivers for these. And don't want hangs/losses anymore while composing.
(BTW I had issue with GT2 in Linux, I couldn't save, maybe the Linux wasn't configured well or the GT2 package was compiled wrong...). A MAC is expensive for me, and I even can't say that MACOSx is as safe as C64..
There are some missing functions from the native C64 trackers, first of all, e.g. a simple function: saving an instrument, that you may made for an hour or so...
(DMC has this function if I know well.)
Other important things that are useful: keyjazz (hear note when typing), instrument-detune, MMC/IDE64 compatibility, multispeed, mute/solo tracks, definable HR-type & timer for all instruments....
Most of even the best trackers lacks one or more of these functions. Some have special keymappings to learn..
All in all, I decided to spend my freetime for writing a native C64 tracker that may have everything that a SID-composer needs.
Tha player routine is in half way, an now this is the point when you can come up with ideas your actual tracker is lacking.
Then in this forum we can discuss if it's possible and useful, and logical, etc...
E.g. let me to share my feature-ideas and the actual plans for the player and editor. These are not the usual features (as e.g. funktempo) but some special things:
PLAYER:
-------
-The player will handle the average maximums, 32 subtunes,
255 long orderlists, max.127 of 255 long patterns, 32 instruments.
-The patterns will basically contain only the notes, and
Instruments+FX-es+values only stored if they're there
(this way we have 4 columns per track in memory virtually,
the player can handle this format already.)
-Orderlists will contain data in similar way, so we have
a 2nd 'virtual' column for
transpose/repeat/jump/end and SUBTUNE-CHANGE commands
-I will implement 'Keyboard-track' command as I did in my
3SID tracker. Cutoff freq. can depend on note-pitch..
-Will try to logarythmize the Pulsewidth & Cutoff freq..
sweeps, making bass-filtering more detailed, and maybe
same table could be used for calculated vibrato/slide.
-There will be wavetable/pw/ctf programs/pointers also for
GATE-off, not only for note-on...
-Some compression could be achieved with signing long empty
places (zeros) with a number...
-Should we still use WF/PW/FI/HR tables, or own tables for
every instruments? (At least from editor view.)
EDITOR:
-INSTRUMENT SAVE function
-MMC64 & IDE64 compatibility (e.g. Sid Factory / SDI have)
-Waveform-displayer for instrument editor, filter/PW bars..
-Any ideas to make arpeggios easier? e.g. note based arps.
-Unused player code/pattern/instrument optimization (GT2)
-Possibility to save directly into SID format (as GT2 can)
-High resolution/interlaced characters or using borders to
have more columns and rows..
-Rewind-back/ loop-play function like in my 3SID tracker
-Memory usage displayer bar / counter / out of memo sign..
-Orderlist: long patterns' numbers displayed longer, so no skew when playing...
-Some help for ringmodulation (sign tracks, calculate f1+f2)
....
As you could see, these would be sophisticated features that could make SID-composing easier...and IMO, they're realizable, it's only question of time ...
Tell me bravely, if you have anything new to mention...
Hermit Software HungaryHermit Software Hungary |
|
... 63 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Linus
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 639 |
That's exactly my point, Stein :)
|
| |
Dane
Account closed
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 421 |
Yeah, that makes more sense. I've had the same problem a few times but solved it with either splitting the tune in two or chopping sequences up into smaller pieces which were then recycled. |
| |
SIDWAVE
Account closed
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2238 |
Dane: well, EOD soundtracker could probably have been in 1 file at 7-10K if you have made it with SDI.
It's quite an achievement splitting a 14 minute tune to 9 ? 4K parts.. :D |
| |
Dane
Account closed
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 421 |
Fifteen! And I think a lot of that came from the fact that the player was optimized with unlooped code. Make a version of the tune in 7-10k if you want, but I don't think you'll make it work in tandem with HCL's code. :) |
| |
Hermit
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 208 |
What do you all think about the pattern-edit methods?
In my opinion, JCH's SEQ+Pattern method was a great invention, and I also like as it is implemented in XSID (switchable to orderlist with '=' ).
But if there is a possibility for individual track-speeds, it's hard to imagine the JCH method correctly working..or at least it wouldn't be easily followed by users..
(To keep syncronization, some (faster) tracks have to move faster than the others when they are scrolled at editing/playing...)
Editing differently fast tracks would be followable easier by the user with Goattracker's normal pattern edit method...
To keep sync in mind while composing, btw, the orderlist elements should be sensitively displayed in length (graphically?) to the tempo-change & pattern length.
The best would be if we can switch between JCH and GT pattern-editing mode in the tracker for our own taste..who knows, at the end it can happen :)
Hermit Software Hungary |
| |
Hermit
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 208 |
Coming soon :)
------------
hermit |
| |
Soren
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 547 |
Hermit: Looking forward to that. :-)
|
| |
Digger
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 427 |
Yiiiiiiihhhhha! That's a great news Hermit. I've been waiting for this editor for around 14 years (no pressure) ;-) |
| |
Martin Piper
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 718 |
I added the ability to switch between pattern editing modes in Music Studio 2.1.0.7
Lately I've been thinking of what can be done to improve instrument editing and adding some form of MIDI input. But I have no firm plans yet for the next version.
So since I'm just a programmer I really could do with input from musicians. |
| |
Hermit
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 208 |
Hi Guys. I owe you with some update about SID-Wizard project:
I had some lags due to other hobbies and tasks, but when I have some time I always return to finish the code of SID-Wizard.
Since my last post I nearly finished the in-place compression/decompression routines for the workfile, so the saved workfiles will be small. Soon I continue with saver/loader menu and subroutines, then some player code optimisations are coming. (And a separate packer/optimizer to further optimize and create/relocate SID and PRG tunes out of compressed workfiles.)
I nearly finished the user manual in LyX which can be exported to PDF/html and even plain text... there are some minor known bugs yet in editor which can cause corrupt data.
I'll release a beta/1.0 hopefully before xmas, with the source codes, so the project will go open-source. So everyone will be able to optimize code or add features....
|
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 - Next |
