| |
Knight Rider
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 116 |
Event id #3294 : X-2024
I was having a discussion with a few guys over beers in X'2023 and the compos. I was telling about my days as OR8 pilot in the RC world where we had junior, hobby and pro categories for the races.
To make it abit more motivational the people/groups who aren't 20 members strong each with 30+ years of demo coding experience it might be worth while considering other options ?
eg. some of the ideas we discussed:
. Having a pro (ie previous winner category) and hobby section so that contributors are compared to peers of similar experience
. Splitting the voting/ranking for 1 filers from multi disk entries
. Newcomer award for those individuals or teams who never submitted to X before |
|
... 156 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
enthusi
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 675 |
And no one should be above 1.70m tall, I suggest.
Not trying to ridicule an ongoing discussion but I find it indeed quite weird to tell people what (not) to do in their free time.
Plus: this X was (again) super amazing. Why change it or anything about it? |
| |
Burglar
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 1054 |
Funny thread this, people trying to change the rules so they can win. Not by merit, but by adding restrictions for our best coders, graphicians and musicians. The answer is no :)
Collaboration is key in the demo-scene, something that should be encouraged and cherished.
What many of you are forgetting is that this was the first X after 5 years, it's only logical that so many sceners and groups went all-out, resulting in the biggest and best X compo ever. Yes it was overwhelming, yes beating any of the top 10 will be impossible for most, yes, this was X :)
Since we are throwing another one in less than a year, all of the suggested restrictions are irrelevant: there simply is not enough time for any group to deliver the same huge size and quality of demos.
Quoting Groepaz... i think that annual party actually makes the compos more "approachable" again. ... this :)
It doesn't mean we may do some small changes to the setup, but we need time to relax and evaluate. I still haven't fully recovered :) |
| |
Krill
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2870 |
Quoting BurglarSince we are throwing another one in less than a year, all of the suggested restrictions are irrelevant: there simply is not enough time for any group to deliver the same huge size and quality of demos. As was mentioned above, it's possible when skipping an X (or two). A few big players haven't participated this year... =) |
| |
Raistlin
Registered: Mar 2007
Posts: 588 |
Quote: Quoting Wile CoyoteIt would put an end to either a coder, musician, graphician, designer etc appearing in (being credited for) more than one demo in any one ‘Demo’ compo. And why is that a problem. Seriously.
IRQ loaders are one problem. How many used Bitbreaker loader this time? Quite a few I believe..? |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11164 |
Quote:As was mentioned above, it's possible when skipping an X (or two). A few big players haven't participated this year... =)
So the obvious thing is to make participation mandatory. OR ELSE! |
| |
Krill
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2870 |
Quoting RaistlinIRQ loaders are one problem. How many used Bitbreaker loader this time? Quite a few I believe..? So? What's your point? Why is this a problem? :) |
| |
ChristopherJam
Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 1390 |
From now on, each entry must be created by a single scener who wrote the entire thing including tools by using the action replay monitor, one entry per scener.
Workstages in the form of a twitch stream of the desk in the codermusiciangraphicians bedroom from the past seven years. |
| |
iAN CooG
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 3142 |
> using the action replay monitor
pfft, the real scener(TM) uses his own built cart monitor, not using pre-existing ones, because they are lame by definition and don't work how he wants anyway. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11164 |
POKEs baby |
| |
Boogaloo
Registered: Aug 2019
Posts: 21 |
And the demo must be called "The 4 Yorkshire men". |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ... | 17 - Next |
