| |
mankeli
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 127 |
Message for 4agentE
Thanks a lot for derailing the thread. I was just writing you a message that you should start behaving. You can be as autistic you want (your own words) but please stop acting like this is a matter of life and death.
I would have been happy to continue the discussion about the actual real timelines of things instead of that bullshit.
Also CountZero, how about a warning first? |
|
... 20 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11281 |
How does that matter?
It was popular enough for me to get c-net stuff on tapes in germany, 85ish. with zero contact to "swappers" or "scene". |
| |
mankeli
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 127 |
I think it matters! :D The world was a lot slowly connected back then. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11281 |
Regarding demoscene, it certainly had a much bigger impact than any other early network :) |
| |
4gentE
Registered: Mar 2021
Posts: 178 |
Look Mankeli, I’m sure you can read (although one would be pardoned to wonder judging by you misspelling my handle) as can everybody else around here. If you re-read your thread in chronological order, it’s dead obvious that the one who derailed your subject was Krill. He turned your subject into his crusade against the premise that demoscene emanated from crackerscene. Which was NOT your subject as I recall. He turned your thread into continuation of his personal crusade he leads in other places. I was responding to him. Yet, you’re for some bizarre reason calling me out. Go over it all again if you have trouble remembering, see where it got sidetracked. Apology is welcome. |
| |
mankeli
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 127 |
Maybe we can discuss about thread post timelines on another thread? Let's not here. I thought the crackerscene / demoscene origin discussion was topical atleast, atleast until it was just arguing. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11281 |
Quote:his personal crusade he leads in other places
please elaborate |
| |
4gentE
Registered: Mar 2021
Posts: 178 |
I was totally oblivious of CompuNet at the time. That’s the reason swapping was my only source of demos along with the cracks. When I heard about CompuNet later it seemed like science fiction to me. At the time I thought the only use for modems was to dial US warez BBSs using stolen calling card numbers. So if indeed there was a whole demoscene outside mailswapping scene active on CompuNet, I never knew.
P.S. Mankeli, I wish you named this thread differently. |
| |
4gentE
Registered: Mar 2021
Posts: 178 |
Quote:please elaborate
Not here. I (seem to) have done enough derailing. |
| |
Krill
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2940 |
Quoting chatGPZIt was popular enough for me to get c-net stuff on tapes in germany, 85ish. with zero contact to "swappers" or "scene". Interesting! How did you get those tapes? Schoolyard? Kiosk? "Public domain" mailorder? =) |
| |
mankeli
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 127 |
Yeah CompuNet indeed feels like science fiction. :D And sorry, I hope the mods can rename the thread.
It also kinda follows the trend that lots of these "new ideas" were invented a lot earlier but the other infrastructure around (technical and social) them was not there yet. Was CompuNet focused on computer arts or was it more business oriented? |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 - Next |
