Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
 Welcome to our latest new user Nicron ! (Registered 2024-05-21) You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Entries > Release id #47904 : Joe Gunn Preview
2007-03-24 19:01
Oswald

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5028
Release id #47904 : Joe Gunn Preview

Now what was the fucking idea with releasing this? Showing your packer using, cruncher and introlinking skills? Triad was the name for quality for me. Now Triad equals a bunch of fucking lamers not being able to do anything but put intros in front of non protected games, games that are not even finished, games that are made for fun, and for free. You didnt even needed a first supplier, just downloaded it added an intro... for what fucking reason?

Stop being lame and releasing shite under the triad label.
 
... 104 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2007-03-26 18:23
Oswald

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5028
Trazan,

yeah sorry for being so ignorant and only realising in 2007 that the illegal scene was just a bunch of pathethic thieves :)


and for Fungus, join the retro gaming scene, where the big BS is. You dont realise that the demo scene makes the history since the 2nd half of the nineties, as your so beloved PARASITE scene has nothing left to munch on, but a few ppl making games for free. Feel free to think that stealing something is more creative than creating something, and that the c64 scene is all about ripping others off.
2007-03-26 18:25
Scout

Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 1568
And he goes on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on.....

*sigh*
2007-03-26 18:26
Fungus

Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 629
I agree with Igno and Jazzcat, I would have NEVER seen this game otherwise.

And I appreciate their bringing it to my attention. I rather look forward to seeing the final version.


Oswald, Krill : Stick to what you know, demos.
2007-03-26 18:42
Oswald

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5028
Fungus, sending a mail to a list doesnt justifies to infect it with a intro. or these days in the crack scene this is such a groundbreaking effort, and they even introduced this game to ppl that didnt know it, wow much more creative and kewl and less elitist than working hard for months on a demo! I guess crackers even listen to you and do what u tell em instead of the closed minded nasty demo coders :))
2007-03-26 18:56
Trazan

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 620
Quote: Trazan,

yeah sorry for being so ignorant and only realising in 2007 that the illegal scene was just a bunch of pathethic thieves :)


and for Fungus, join the retro gaming scene, where the big BS is. You dont realise that the demo scene makes the history since the 2nd half of the nineties, as your so beloved PARASITE scene has nothing left to munch on, but a few ppl making games for free. Feel free to think that stealing something is more creative than creating something, and that the c64 scene is all about ripping others off.


Oh, I never did call you ignorant - I just asked if you actually knew a bit about the scene you complain about?

I guess I can clearly say that there IS no illegal scene, hasnt been for years. Competition is gone. Whats left is alot of ppl who did once provide us with a scene blooming with releases and the race to be the best.

Triad did good putting out a preview noone would most likely ever see - selfish or not, they did a good job by judging from Twoflowers comments about the release with bugtesting.

If the effort was to make a 3 minute introlink or put down hours of bugtesting is not of interest here - You still fail to see the tradition of a Scene you never did take part in live on?!


I love this...but it should be illegal.
2007-03-26 19:27
Oswald

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5028
the concept of spreading a game is nice, however in 2007 sending a mail around needs no effort. Or may I introlink triad releases any time when I send them to a friend?

btw, whats the point in bugtesting/bugfixing a preview?
2007-03-26 19:31
Trazan

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 620
To me, hell yes, introlink anything you wish you.
it only proves you still dont know what the "illegal" scene was about.

I request you to introlink Cucumber Juice 2 and release. And Im serious about it.
All you have to do, is stand up for your deeds.
2007-03-26 19:49
Moloch

Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 2896
Excellent, my supply of this preview has caused so much chaos that I'll make sure to supply a few more shortly.

Enjoy.
2007-03-26 19:59
taper

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 119
By now, Oswald has put more energy into whining about a minor release than it took us to introlink AND play it. So, I think we all know what Oswald thinks. Thanks for sharing, eventhough you're more than a decade too late.

Others have stated that they like it, and would never have laid eyes on the preview if we didn't spread it around. Thus, taste differs.

Most people who aren't interested would refrain from downloading and spending their energy on something that did not interest them. But not Oswald, he was born a cranky bitch.

Also I find it quite amusing that Oswald acts like Triad never release anything but small introlinked previews. Let me spell it out for you; This was hardly a major release for us. We release demos, graphics, music and bigger games on a steady basis. And an occasional small preview, that you can just ignore in case you don't like it. Take a look on what Triad released just during the last year, and compare it to what Resource put out. It doesn't take a genious to see what group is the most active.

If you were half as active coding as you are whining, you would be a hell of a lot more useful for the scene. However, I don't expect your activity to ever match the size of your mouth.

Whatever stupidity that comes out of Oswald's mouth next, for me this topic is closed. I will not invest as much energy as Oswald has in this discussion, as I simply don't agree with him - or think it's a matter big enough to waste time on. We do what we have done for ages, and we quite frankly don't give a fuck what someone who never was involved in the cracking scene at any time in history think about that.
2007-03-26 20:23
JackAsser

Registered: Jun 2002
Posts: 1994
Why isn't my Eye of the Beholder preview intro linked, debugged and tested?!? I AM OFFENDED!!! ;) (Well, seriously I know why.. ;) BUT STILL!!)
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
lA-sTYLe/Quantum
Operator Teleksu
d0c
Guests online: 77
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.8)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Mojo  (9.7)
4 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
5 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
6 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
7 Uncensored  (9.6)
8 No Bounds  (9.6)
9 Bromance  (9.5)
10 Lunatico  (9.5)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
5 Copper Booze  (9.6)
6 TRSAC, Gabber & Pebe..  (9.5)
7 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
8 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
9 Quadrants  (9.5)
10 Daah, Those Acid Pil..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Oxyron  (9.3)
2 Booze Design  (9.3)
3 Censor Design  (9.3)
4 Crest  (9.3)
5 Performers  (9.3)
Top Fullscreen Graphicians
1 Carrion  (9.8)
2 Joe  (9.8)
3 Duce  (9.8)
4 Mirage  (9.7)
5 Facet  (9.7)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.048 sec.