Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Discussions > VICE new 8580 filters test build
2020-05-11 21:39
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11127
VICE new 8580 filters test build

https://sourceforge.net/projects/vice-emu/files/experimental%20..

this is supposed to fix the "farting filters" in the new revised 8580 filter code by leandro nini.

please check problematic tunes :)
 
... 20 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2020-05-16 00:07
psych

Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 140
So I have no clue why 2.4 sounds better to me :) Maybe this 25 years of sid masturbation slowely destroys my hearing :)
2020-05-16 00:51
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11127
Quote:
Maybe this 25 years of masturbation slowely destroys my hearing :)

fixed =D
2020-05-16 11:42
spider-j

Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 446
Hey, thx @ Groepaz for the personal invitation :-)

I can confirm the current revision fixed that weird distortion glitch I got on my vice builds.

The tune in this demo had heavy problems before: You Will Be a Fossil Soon

New Filters Before:
https://jansalleine.com/trans/fossil-vice-new-filters.wav

New Filters Current:
https://jansalleine.com/trans/fossil-vice-new-filters-r37853.wav

Old Filters:
https://jansalleine.com/trans/fossil-vice-old-filters.wav

Unfortunately I still don't have a setup that allows recording from real machine for a "real" comparison. But it for sure doesn't sound anything like the completely distorted filters in the first WAV ;-)
2020-05-16 13:07
Burglar

Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 1033
I think it's safe to conclude it's all Linus & GRG's fault. Without them, emulation would've been perfect for years already ;)

also playing that fossil intro now, and yup this sounds pretty good now, I also remember this one sounded fucked up in the past too.
2020-05-16 16:37
psych

Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 140
Quote: Quote:
Maybe this 25 years of masturbation slowely destroys my hearing :)

fixed =D


Thanks. I thought it’s due to the heavy overload of loud sid listening ;) should stop wanking immediately ;)
I did few comparisons with real hardware recording done by Xiny6581 and I still think new version struggles with filters. Check Hang Drum - https://youtu.be/FMbT2EtJqY8 and then listen to it at Vice. There is slight difference. Vice 2.4 sounds exactly as on the real machine. Maybe it just me but you were asking for the feedback so I’ve shared my five cents.
2020-05-16 16:57
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11127
Damn nice tune :=)

I can hear the problem with the regular filters (which are like 2.4), but not with the new ones. *shrug*
2020-05-16 17:57
psych

Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 140
Ok, I've been adjusting filter bias and by increasing the value up to -2200/-2400 it sounds better.

In case of this tune Bad Ass I went up to -1500 to achieve good result.

Thanks for your hard work guys.
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
Krill/Plush
t0m3000/ibex-crew
MCM/ONSLAUGHT
Courage
goerp/F4CG
Viti/Hokuto Force
CA$H/TRiAD
Guests online: 131
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.8)
2 Mojo  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
4 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
5 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
6 No Bounds  (9.6)
7 Uncensored  (9.6)
8 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
9 Memento Mori  (9.6)
10 Bromance  (9.5)
Top onefile Demos
1 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.7)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.7)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.5)
5 TRSAC, Gabber & Pebe..  (9.5)
6 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
7 Wafer Demo  (9.5)
8 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
9 Quadrants  (9.5)
10 Daah, Those Acid Pil..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Nostalgia  (9.3)
2 Oxyron  (9.3)
3 Booze Design  (9.3)
4 Censor Design  (9.3)
5 Crest  (9.3)
Top Crackers
1 Mr. Z  (9.9)
2 Antitrack  (9.8)
3 OTD  (9.8)
4 S!R  (9.7)
5 Faayd  (9.7)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.05 sec.