| |
The Gothicman
Account closed
Registered: Aug 2011
Posts: 40 |
Relaunch64 #3 Beta1 released!
Relaunch64 #3 Beta1 released!
Now as JAR-file.
Looks promising to me :)
http://www.popelganda.de/ |
|
... 49 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386 |
if you cant tell what makes it better than the editor i am using (which happens to be kate), i dont see a need really. i am not missing anything :) |
| |
TTE
Account closed
Registered: Jan 2013
Posts: 2 |
Hi all, beta 2 of Relaunch64 released:
http://www.popelganda.de/Relaunch64_beta2.jar
https://sourceforge.net/projec...-Releases/ (sourcecode)
Find/Replace and Undo/Redo implemented. But, undo/redo also undoes each highlightig step, which should actually be ignored as undo action, but this don't work right now. Trying to figure out how I can solve this problem.
I don't think it's that important to know or "prove" which editor is the better one. It might be a matter of taste on the one hand, and having alternatives, on the other hand, isn't also that bad either. I'm always open to feature suggestions. I'm happy if people like Relaunch64 and use it. And finally, I also do this because I like to do some programming in my free time. ;-)
Best wishes
Daniel
|
| |
TTE
Account closed
Registered: Jan 2013
Posts: 2 |
Quote: I think it's a matter of taste. All these editors seem to feature 6502-coloring and running assembler+emulator directly from editor. Different in Relaunch is the output-window on the side I think - which is nice for people like me who forget a ":" behind labels all the time ;-)
The silly thing is that Relaunch still misses showing linenumbers. So not much good reporting which lines in sourcecode that have errors :-)
Now if I only can get my Notepad++ to run kickass.jar with the current .asm file as input then maybe I will turn to coding with my favorite text editor...
Line numbers are now supported in the current beta 2-release :-) |
| |
Testicle
Account closed
Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 131 |
May I hijack this old thread?
I'm working on Relaunch64 again, and beta 8 is released. You find further information on:
http://www.popelganda.de (homepage)
https://sourceforge.net/projects/relaunch64/files/ (binaries jar/exe)
https://github.com/sjPlot/Relaunch64 (latest source)
The current beta 8 requires Java 8 installed. I've added a lot of features since the release from 1 year ago. Currently, ACME and KickAss are supported as compilers. Frodo, Vice, CCS64 and Emu64 are supported emulators.
The application's log and emulator/compiler log were separated, but with beta 8 I integrated them into one panel on the lower right part of the screen. If you have any ideas what to put in the upper right panel, let me know :-)
Btw, is anybody still using Relaunch64 or is probably going to use it? If there's not much interest in further development, I would probably spend less energy to it.
Best wishes
Daniel |
| |
Testicle
Account closed
Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 131 |
Added release to CSDB: Relaunch64 V3.0 Beta 8 |
| |
satpro
Account closed
Registered: Oct 2013
Posts: 7 |
Works fine with 64Tass!
This version is better. It's my first stab at a Version 3 release. Version 2 would grab a ridiculous amount of memory, but this one is fine. Good job. |
| |
soci
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 480 |
I think there must have been a good reason this was coded exclusively for Java SE 8.
It's like I would write something which only runs with Python 3.4 but not on any earlier versions. (it was released a day before Java SE 8)
There's a difference though. There's a python 3.4 package, while there's only an openjdk-7 package in Debian.
But I'm probably not the right user for this anyway ;( |
| |
Testicle
Account closed
Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 131 |
Quote: I think there must have been a good reason this was coded exclusively for Java SE 8.
It's like I would write something which only runs with Python 3.4 but not on any earlier versions. (it was released a day before Java SE 8)
There's a difference though. There's a python 3.4 package, while there's only an openjdk-7 package in Debian.
But I'm probably not the right user for this anyway ;(
I wanted to see and use the new features of Java 8, and since Java 8 is available for windows, Linux and OS X, I thought there won't be much restrictions for other users. And, Java 8 is said to be faster than java 6 and 7... :-) |
| |
spider-j
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 498 |
Just updated my system: OpenJDK 8 is still not in arch linux repos, too. Sorry, but I won't start compiling sth. like Java which is a dependancy of many other packages just to try out this one tool. Guess I'll just wait. |
| |
MagerValp
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1078 |
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jre8-do.. |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 - Next |
