| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001 Posts: 11386 |
VSP Hardware fix revealed
click here
Many thanks to everyone involved. HAVE FUN! |
|
... 10 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts.... |
| |
AmiDog
Registered: Mar 2003 Posts: 97 |
@Groepaz: I doubt that, since it probably wouldn't pass his "install by girlfriend test" which prevented an internal ACA500 for example. And this most likely wouldn't be any easier to install for said girlfriend... |
| |
ChristopherJam
Registered: Aug 2004 Posts: 1409 |
Ugh, phrasing. My wife's at least as capable as I am at installing hardware.
We've both dismembered various tightly packed laptops and small formfactor PCs to replace drives etc, and her soldering's a hell of a lot cleaner than mine is. |
| |
ready.
Registered: Feb 2003 Posts: 441 |
@ChristopherJam: you said wife, AmiDog was talking about girlfriend. Probably you wounldn't have married her if she did not pass the girlfriend test. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001 Posts: 11386 |
AmiDog: a much more important reason is that it will not work the same on different board revisions, and require soldering with some of them. ie: support nightmare. |
| |
Perplex
Registered: Feb 2009 Posts: 255 |
Quoting Bobo/ I can go hay wire on VSP now.. no limitations o/
In what way have you been limiting yourself up until now? :-) |
| |
AlexC
Registered: Jan 2008 Posts: 299 |
Quote: AmiDog: you can bet on that if such simple adapter solution would be possible, jens would have made a product out of it :)
"Is there anywhere a list of releases using VSP?"
ugh, no. that'd be a huge list =) however, the problem even exists for programs that dont actually use VSP, but simply switch $d011 without synchronizing to the beam - which may or may not trigger the bug (with a roughly 1:312 chance)
I never took a while to think about it but you are obviously right. Anyway I still wonder how many releases are being hit by VSP issue. In case of demos I doubt there is a lot of software not synchronizing with beam. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001 Posts: 11386 |
you can almost bet on that a random program that uses raster irq does a non synced write to $d011 somewhere at the beginning :) |
Previous - 1 | 2 - Next |