You are not logged in -
nap
CSDb User Forums
Forums
>
CSDb Entries
>
Group id #2667 : ABC Crackings
2005-11-15
19:10
hwm
Account closed
Registered: Feb 2005
Posts: 7
Group id #2667 : ABC Crackings
I corrected the information already but I'd rather give an explanation too, to prevent misunderstanding in the future. If someone thinks different about this, let me know.
Originally, I added the "Founded by" and "Dissolved in" entries for this group. However, they've been changed to respectively "1983" & "1987" instead of my "1984" & "1985".
I can see why someone would do this, since their releases/cracks span the years 1983-1987. However I don't think that's correct. They might have cracked games *from* 1983, however those days not being "zero-day" and all, I rather think the cracking itself was done in 1984 or so.
Also, the group ceased to exist in 1985. The only thing happened after that was that 2 people named Hawk & Junior "resurrected" the group with permission from ABC member ADJ (they claim). I don't know if the proper term is "resurrected", since the only thing they did is releasing a piece of ripped music.
Which brings me to another point. Should this kind of people be included with the original group? I wouldn't call them imposters, since they probably got permission from ADJ (who I recall left ABC some time before the group ceased to exist), but it's not that they did something significant in name of the group. I do not care about it that much, but I'm just curious how this situation is usually treated in CSDb?
... 10 posts hidden. Click
here
to view all posts....
2005-11-25
16:15
CyberBrain
Administrator
Posts: 392
Another revival? :)
If it's a different group that just happens to have the same name, it should have it's own group-entry.
If it's a revival it should not have it's own entry, as it's the same group.
What Zyron and hwm were saying (i think) was that the revived ABC Crackings wasn't really a revival, but a new group that just was given permission to use the same name.
2005-11-25
17:12
Mason
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 462
well I was just trying to be annoying :) Doesnt really concern till we got the release.
2019-08-06
09:51
Fred
Registered: Feb 2003
Posts: 287
Releases mentioned in
Rambo: First Blood Part II
that are still missing:
Frankie Goes to Hollywood
Hyper Sports
Releases mentioned in
Space-Pilot II
that are still missing:
Staff of Karnat
Lands of Havoc!
Boulder Dash II
Previous
-
1
| 2 - Next
Refresh
Subscribe to this thread:
You need to be logged in to post in the forum.
Search the forum:
Search
All forums
C64 Coding
C64 Composing
C64 Pixeling
C64 Productions
CSDb Bug Reports
CSDb Development
CSDb Discussions
CSDb Entries
CSDb Feedback
CSDb Info
CSDb moderators
CSDb Questions
Messages to moderators
Requests
for
in
Writer & text
Text
Writer
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
All
Releases
Groups
Sceners
Events
BBS
SIDs
-------
Forum
Comments
Advanced
Users Online
Black Hole
Chrx/Design/Chaos
Guests online: 129
Top Demos
1
Next Level
(9.7)
2
13:37
(9.7)
3
Coma Light 13
(9.6)
4
Edge of Disgrace
(9.6)
5
Mojo
(9.6)
6
Uncensored
(9.6)
7
The Demo Coder
(9.6)
8
Comaland 100%
(9.6)
9
What Is The Matrix 2
(9.6)
10
Unboxed
(9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1
Layers
(9.7)
2
Cubic Dream
(9.6)
3
Party Elk 2
(9.6)
4
Copper Booze
(9.6)
5
Dawnfall V1.1
(9.5)
6
Rainbow Connection
(9.5)
7
Morph
(9.5)
8
Libertongo
(9.5)
9
Onscreen 5k
(9.5)
10
It's More Fun to Com..
(9.5)
Top Groups
1
Booze Design
(9.3)
2
Oxyron
(9.3)
3
Performers
(9.3)
4
Triad
(9.3)
5
Censor Design
(9.3)
Top Swappers
1
Derbyshire Ram
(10)
2
Jerry
(9.8)
3
Violator
(9.7)
4
Acidchild
(9.7)
5
Cash
(9.7)
Home
-
Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2025
Page generated in: 0.033 sec.