| |
jailbird
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1578 |
Who's messing with my functions?
Addressing the person who corrected my infos (yet again).
Please, for the very last time: I'm awared about the existence of "fullscreen graphician" and "logo graphician" functions, but I don't want to be associated with them. Why is this so hard to understand?
To whom it may concern, check out the following topic as well:
http://noname.c64.org/csdb/forums/?roomid=4&topicid=25803&showa.. |
|
... 21 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
jailbird
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1578 |
People, you're not helping me at all :)
Anyhow, I'd kindly ask the person who messed up my infos, not to do so any more. Everything is going back to its original state... |
| |
Zyron
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 2381 |
Put a note in your trivia or something. The one responsible might not even read this thread. |
| |
jailbird
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1578 |
Ok, I think I get it. It's a bit confusing (like a lot of other things here), so just to let you know what actually happened...
When someone is editing a certain membership in group infos (even in groups where the scener is labelled as inactive, trial or former), he could add/remove functions for a certain scener on his own, and the functions will show up on the scener's userpage. It would be nice to change this so only the actual sceners could add/remove their functions? |
| |
ptoing
Registered: Sep 2005
Posts: 271 |
Just on a side note, I think "Fullscreen Graphician" and "Logo Graphician" are stupid functions. Just "Graphician" would be enough imo. Or we could also add "Sprite Graphician" and "Charset Graphician". |
| |
Krill
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2969 |
Yes, and also divide the "coder" job into raster, maths, OS and drive coder. |
| |
jailbird
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1578 |
Quoting Perff (from http://noname.c64.org/csdb/forums/?roomid=4&topicid=25803&showa..)I guess it won't be nessesary, but how about I dig up the old survey system so people can make a vote on it? :)
I can't remember why we made those types back then, but I guess that whoever thought it up, thought it was a good idea... ??
Till now not even one fair reason showed up why are the graphician sub-functions necessary so just crop them out finally, will you? :) No voting is neccessary! |
| |
enthusi
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 677 |
Hm, possibly some coders that did Logos (back "then") ?
I think that was quite common. So maybe some are proud but yet modest enough not to call themselves Graphician?
Just an idea to spice up the 'discussion' when indeed, I see no need |
| |
jailbird
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1578 |
Ok, but in that case all those graphicians who ever coded viewers for their graphics should get a "Viewer-coder" function as well. |
| |
enthusi
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 677 |
that would lead to the question if someone who can code is a coder or just someone who does code.
I want an extra box "optional" for each category :) |
| |
Helm
Account closed
Registered: Jul 2006
Posts: 25 |
I for one never understood the divisions of Graphicians, especially 'full-screen' as opposed to what? If I leave 30 pixel rows dead at the bottom of my pic, am I not a full-screen graphician anymore? |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 - Next |
