Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Discussions > Wikipedia Boneheads...
2008-04-16 13:48
DeeKay

Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 363
Wikipedia Boneheads...

1541 Ultimate needs its own entry!

Wikipedian CSDb-Users to teh rescue! ;-)
 
... 11 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2008-04-17 23:01
DeeKay

Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 363
linde: word! ;-) That, or we could read about 7000 Wikipedia-pages on every tiny scrap in the fictional Stargate universe! ;-) Or how about checking out an individual page on every single one of 416 Simpsons episodes ever created? 8) Seeing all this glorious and indispensable content, who still needs a small page on an actual product you can buy that will make quite a few people happy? 8))))

Basically, that Otherstuffexists page is nothing more than Wikipedia covering its ears singing "LALALA I can't hear you!"...

Or how about that crystal ball page they always love to refer to - Every FUCKING VIDEOGAME AND MOVIE has had their own wikipedia page long before it hits the store/silverscreen! How's that for crystal balls, you dumb fucks?

All that talk about "this violates that golden rule by which we Wikicops act!" coptalk is complete and utter BS, Wikipedia IS FULL OF CRAP! That's a fact and everybody knows it! Not just what the articles are about, also the content! But it's OUR CRAP, and I always thought that was the appeal (well atleast for me! ;-) and also the idea behind Wikipedia....
2008-04-17 23:22
Cruzer

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1048
Wikipedia is run by crooks (like everything else)
2008-04-18 06:15
CreaMD

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3052
Quote: linde: word! ;-) That, or we could read about 7000 Wikipedia-pages on every tiny scrap in the fictional Stargate universe! ;-) Or how about checking out an individual page on every single one of 416 Simpsons episodes ever created? 8) Seeing all this glorious and indispensable content, who still needs a small page on an actual product you can buy that will make quite a few people happy? 8))))

Basically, that Otherstuffexists page is nothing more than Wikipedia covering its ears singing "LALALA I can't hear you!"...

Or how about that crystal ball page they always love to refer to - Every FUCKING VIDEOGAME AND MOVIE has had their own wikipedia page long before it hits the store/silverscreen! How's that for crystal balls, you dumb fucks?

All that talk about "this violates that golden rule by which we Wikicops act!" coptalk is complete and utter BS, Wikipedia IS FULL OF CRAP! That's a fact and everybody knows it! Not just what the articles are about, also the content! But it's OUR CRAP, and I always thought that was the appeal (well atleast for me! ;-) and also the idea behind Wikipedia....


Reasonable too.
2008-04-18 14:50
hollowman

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 474
Quoting CreaMD

well... it's IMHO huge historical achievement (if it does what it is supposed to do) so it should get it's entry in WIKIPEDIA (sooner or later), but probably not now.. we need to wait for year or so until it gets spread and properly tested.

The first ones have been delivered and miztluren(who paid after me but still got his before me..mumble mumble..) reports that he's been running sharp and demos from speedfisters from it, so its already safe to say that it does what its supposed to do ;)
2008-04-18 17:56
DeeKay

Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 363
Just got mine today!!!! ;-) Didn't have the chance to try it out yet, but it is beautifully manufactured! I'll probably try to mod a case from an unusable BTX-decoder to fit....
2008-04-19 13:03
Hein

Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 946
DK, what's that with the reference from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodore_64_peripherals
to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1541_Ultimate
yours:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1541_ultimate

Maybe it helps to correct the link in the C64 peripherals page.
I'm no wiki expert, though the whole community thing is interesting. I hope it will get out of hand, resulting in total madness. \o/
2008-04-19 13:05
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11360
it already did :=)
2008-04-19 13:07
Hein

Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 946
I think they're quite civilised still, but this little 'deletion' discussion is probably only a tip of the iceberg.
2008-04-19 14:51
El Topo

Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 43
There are hordes of mentally challenged individuals on Wikipedia whos sole purpose in life is to delete other peoples' articles. I've encountered quite a few on the Swedish section, I imagine there are 10x more on the english variant. The best way of avoiding them is not to contribute to Wikipedia in he first place but to create sepparate wikis were these people have no say.
2008-04-19 14:54
assiduous
Account closed

Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 343
hi

there are several ways to get the article you want in Wikipedia even if it might seem non-notable to most. the most effective is to post a large amount of relevant information on the subject in a more general article. in this case that would be "Commodore_64_peripherals". when your part of the article is exceedingly long compared to the others you bring up the subject and the wikipedia staff will be more than happy to allow creating a separate article.

hope this helps
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
Perff/No Name
Pajda/Faith Design
Acidchild/Padua
Boogaloo/Horizon
Jetboy/Elysium
Didi/Laxity
zscs
REBEL 1/HF
Mike
JackAsser/Booze Design
Guests online: 109
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
4 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
5 Mojo  (9.6)
6 The Demo Coder  (9.6)
7 What Is The Matrix 2  (9.6)
8 Uncensored  (9.6)
9 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
10 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.6)
5 Libertongo  (9.5)
6 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
7 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
8 Morph  (9.5)
9 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
10 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Performers  (9.3)
2 Booze Design  (9.3)
3 Oxyron  (9.3)
4 Nostalgia  (9.3)
5 Triad  (9.2)
Top Graphicians
1 Mirage  (9.7)
2 Archmage  (9.7)
3 Pal  (9.6)
4 Mikael  (9.6)
5 Carrion  (9.6)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.056 sec.