Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
 Welcome to our latest new user Harvey ! (Registered 2024-11-25) You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Discussions > X2016 Competitions: Your Input Wanted!
2016-02-16 20:07
Burglar

Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 1088
X2016 Competitions: Your Input Wanted!

The 28th of october is still far away but getting closer and closer. The organizers have been getting busy and are now well underway to get everything sorted out for another smashing X!

Since entry delivery and running the compos at X14 went quite smooth and voting is now done in realtime, we believe we may have room for 1 or 2 more (small/fun) c64 competitions. Like a PETSCII compo or a 4k compo, or maybe you guys have an idea?
Or perhaps you think the straightforward demo/music/gfx compos are enough.

Let us know :)
 
... 214 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2016-02-26 09:51
lft

Registered: Jul 2007
Posts: 369
Quoting Burglar
The Chameleon already has support for proper diskflipping, so that's an option.


As long as you're running the demo on the real CPU inside the C64 and using the video output from the real VIC. That is still possible with the Chameleon, right?
2016-02-26 10:32
CeriX

Registered: Nov 2014
Posts: 11
Quote: so I was gonna say...

Thanks for all your input! I will now discuss the possibilities with the other orgs and we'll publish final compo setup asap. I'd say its pretty safe to already get more familiar with PETSCII ;)

I also like the onefile award ($0801-$cfff), especially when not splitting the demo compo.

The Chameleon already has support for proper diskflipping, so that's an option. However we will try to run (multidisk) demos from a real 1541, but it's not a promise just yet.


Huh?
No crunching allowed for the onefile award?
(Or why the restriction to $801-$cfff?)
2016-02-26 11:24
iAN CooG

Registered: May 2002
Posts: 3187
Who said no crunching allowed? the limitation for onefilers is that load range should be 0801-cfff max (202 blocks) loadable from a stock c64 without particular loaders. Crunch like there's no tomorrow.
2016-02-26 11:45
null
Account closed

Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 645
Quote: Quoting Burglar
The Chameleon already has support for proper diskflipping, so that's an option.


As long as you're running the demo on the real CPU inside the C64 and using the video output from the real VIC. That is still possible with the Chameleon, right?


I'm assuming they won't run the chameleon in standalone mode, so yes.
2016-02-26 12:25
algorithm

Registered: May 2002
Posts: 705
The Turbo chameleon takes over the Ram and the CPU via its own core even when connected to the C64.

This opens the possibility of some cheating via activating turbo mode from within the program when required :-) I would guess the testers at the party would somewhat need to either trust the coder(s) or test it on something else before
2016-02-26 13:02
lft

Registered: Jul 2007
Posts: 369
I'm not worried about deliberate cheating, though. People would find out soon enough afterwards, and the perpetrators would be disqualified and publicly shamed. What I care about is that the demo runs on the agreed-upon platform, and not some emulation. While unlikely, there could still be undiscovered glitches left, and coders should be free to exploit them.
2016-02-26 13:12
hedning

Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 4723
No Chameleon ffs. Everything should run on real hw, and 1541U2 is good for most demos; if there are demos with stunning change disk-parts, the contestants could flag for use of real 1541. Why even discuss emulators and Chameleon (that's a nono for me when it comes to compos because of what algorithm said above) and stuff like that?
2016-02-26 15:24
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11359
chameleon is as much a nono as 1541U is. i'd make sure my prod doesnt work on either :)
2016-02-26 15:57
MagerValp

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1074
The sad part is that there's no way you can guarantee that it works on "real hardware". We're talking about mechanical devices at least 25 years old, media that was at best produced in the 90s, and unshielded cables that are sensitive to noise. I've done my best to try and find a known good drive to use, but even so it's failed for no apparent reason during a compo.

The 1541U isn't perfect, but at least it's a known entity that you can test against. As far as I know all the major demo loaders work on it, e.g. Krill, DreamLoad, Spindle, Bitfire - hell even BoozeLoad works :)
2016-02-26 18:03
Cresh

Registered: Jan 2004
Posts: 354
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxyhfiCO_XQ
Previous - 1 | ... | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | ... | 23 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
t0m3000/hf^boom!^ibx
Zardax/Artline Designs
Jak T Rip/DMAgic
Mike
Bob/Censor Design
Luca/FIRE
rexbeng
TheRyk/MYD!
Mythus/Delysid
www.gb64.com
zscs
Slummy/Spaceballs
Guests online: 115
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
4 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
5 Mojo  (9.6)
6 The Demo Coder  (9.6)
7 What Is The Matrix 2  (9.6)
8 Uncensored  (9.6)
9 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
10 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.6)
5 Libertongo  (9.5)
6 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
7 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
8 Morph  (9.5)
9 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
10 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Performers  (9.3)
2 Booze Design  (9.3)
3 Oxyron  (9.3)
4 Nostalgia  (9.3)
5 Triad  (9.2)
Top Musicians
1 Rob Hubbard  (9.7)
2 Jeroen Tel  (9.7)
3 Mutetus  (9.7)
4 Jammer  (9.6)
5 Linus  (9.6)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.062 sec.