| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003 Posts: 1648 |
codebase.c64.org
Hello!
Just wanted to tell you all that the C64 codebase wiki now got a proper URL and can be accessed through:
http://codebase.c64.org/
Enjoy! Greetings to Slaygon for supplying the URL. Now you don't have to remember that old weird URL. ;)
Keep on adding your stuff!
//FTC
|
|
... 24 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts.... |
| |
Bones99
Registered: May 2005 Posts: 30 |
Quote: AS long as lamers like wdr dont start attacking the site. It is almost guaranteed he will do this.
Well .. now that you've said that .. he probably will .. |
| |
icon
Registered: Apr 2002 Posts: 90 |
Quote: btw, how about hosting important materials, like c= hacking, vic article, AAY64, etc ? they dont take up much space, and it would make a nicer knowledge package.
Space is no issue here. Save away som Gigs! :-) |
| |
Richard
Registered: Dec 2001 Posts: 621 |
Quote: btw, how about hosting important materials, like c= hacking, vic article, AAY64, etc ? they dont take up much space, and it would make a nicer knowledge package.
I second that. It sounds like a great idea.
I originally learned some of the demo programming from The Phantom's assembly coding tutorials disk mag (Coders World), as well as from various resources on the Internet like C64.cz utilities section :)
Maybe the codes from the diskmags, with tutorials, etc should be added to the C64 Codebase Wiki. I am sure it would be helpful to new people/programmers to the scene. ;) |
| |
Codey
Registered: Oct 2005 Posts: 79 |
Quote: I second that. It sounds like a great idea.
I originally learned some of the demo programming from The Phantom's assembly coding tutorials disk mag (Coders World), as well as from various resources on the Internet like C64.cz utilities section :)
Maybe the codes from the diskmags, with tutorials, etc should be added to the C64 Codebase Wiki. I am sure it would be helpful to new people/programmers to the scene. ;)
i agree. much of the pasi ojala routines from c= hacking would be useful. |
| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003 Posts: 1648 |
Yes.. The only "problem" is that I dunno exactly how to handle such material in the best way possible. In one sense I think they should be read only, since it would be a distortion of the original material to have them wiki-editable...
Thoughts? |
| |
Fungus
Registered: Sep 2002 Posts: 686 |
Some of the articles also contain error's and bugs, it would be nice to fix them.
also, head over to www.ffd2.com/fridge and grab all the code there.
|
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002 Posts: 5094 |
fungus, go ahead :) |
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002 Posts: 5094 |
Frantic, I think to create a little article writer community it is a must to only allow registered users to edit. but this is only half of my idea, the other half is to make a little forum on the mainpage for messages like "I have added/corrected XYZ" "nice job dude! keep it coming" etc... so this way we would be able to see who made what and also encourage ourselves to add more. :) its pretty soulless to see that the article was edited by 212.63.45.125. :-|
so.. jackasser keep that timing stuff going, dont give up so soon :) |
| |
Nightlord Account closed
Registered: Jan 2003 Posts: 131 |
@Frantic: i don't know much about wikis but, what do you think about moderation of the wiki (from a correction perspective)? I think if you do not want to add writer accounts, than you have a plan on a core team of moderators that routinely checks the content for correctness. Someone can go ahead and put wrong info there and then someoneelse would need to fix it. I don't fully understand which approach is cheaper nad forms a higher quality of content. If you handout trusted writer accounts to respected coders that know their stuff, you could in a way guarantee the correctness right? I might be wroong though just brainstorming :) |
| |
Devia
Registered: Oct 2004 Posts: 401 |
I think this wiki desperately needs a seperate forum and a bunch of "Discuss This Source in Forum"-like buttons attached to all the articles and sources. So that all discussions related to one particular source would remain in one forum thread and article related discussions would remain in one forum thread related to that particular article. |
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 - Next |