| |
MRT
Account closed
Registered: Sep 2005
Posts: 149 |
HowTo: Digi Samples on the SID
Im' thinking of writing a sample-play routine for a demo, but as it seems I'm not sure where to start.
Can somebody explain to me the basics of playing samples on a SID? Things I'm not sure about are:
1. How does one set the volume for one channel? Using the Sustain of the envelope and setting the A, D and R to zero?
2. What kind of wave (Triangle, Block) do I use and why?
3. Do I need a 8x system to play a 400Hz sample? (50 Hz * 8x)
And I prolly have a lot more questions, but I'll ask them when I understand a little more of the basics. :-)
|
|
| |
tlr
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1790 |
The Old-School way is just writing samples into the global 4-bit volume of the sid.
This works (only on 6581?) because there is a considerable offset voltage in the sid before the MDAC that sets the volume.
The 4-bit volume is not linearly spaced, so for optimal results you should convert some 8 or 6-bit samples into the correct 4-bit non-linear steps.
If you want Old-school, don't convert, nobody did! ;)
This will ofcourse introduce all sorts of intermodulation, but somehow it seems to sound passable anyway. Check for example the excellent Jinks intro tune by Chris Huelsbeck. |
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5094 |
for a 400 hz sample you need a replay rate of atleast 800 hz. Imagine a square wave. To represent each high and low state of the wave you need twice the original frequency. This is a rule of thumb in sampling. But for better results you need even more frequency.
And in general, samples are never done using the ADSR registers. You should read one of the article about digis here : http://www.ffd2.com/fridge/chacking/c=hacking20.txt
you might check issue 21 aswell for even more details on square wave samples.
http://www.ffd2.com/fridge/chacking/ |
| |
MRT
Account closed
Registered: Sep 2005
Posts: 149 |
Quote: The Old-School way is just writing samples into the global 4-bit volume of the sid.
This works (only on 6581?) because there is a considerable offset voltage in the sid before the MDAC that sets the volume.
The 4-bit volume is not linearly spaced, so for optimal results you should convert some 8 or 6-bit samples into the correct 4-bit non-linear steps.
If you want Old-school, don't convert, nobody did! ;)
This will ofcourse introduce all sorts of intermodulation, but somehow it seems to sound passable anyway. Check for example the excellent Jinks intro tune by Chris Huelsbeck.
Hmm, yes, but if I use the global volume I won't be able to use the other channels for playing "normal" SID music.
So, there must be another way to do it too...
|
| |
tlr
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1790 |
Quote: Hmm, yes, but if I use the global volume I won't be able to use the other channels for playing "normal" SID music.
So, there must be another way to do it too...
Like I said, that's how it's done in old songs even with 3 voices of sid. Check Jinks, or any Rockmonitor song, or even the Galway Arkanoid, Game Over and Combat School songs. They all work this way.
The sample update speed used differs between songs, but one sample every 2 raster lines is quite common. Use NMI timer interrupt (or include it in the timed raster code) for the best quality. |
| |
Hate Bush
Registered: Jul 2002
Posts: 465 |
MRT, read the article recommended by Oswald. For starters. Almost every issue concerning sample playback is covered there.
(For playing back samples and SID tune at the same time by using global volume register, you have to drag the volume down (to $5-$8) and add subsequent sample values to it (during the NMI interrupt). AFAIR that's how it's done in most digi+SID combinations.) |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386 |
yep, add a DC bias of 8 to the original sample, and compose the regular sid tune with volume=8 .... and as for compensating the non linear behaviour...mmh...i'm not sure if anyone would actually notice, 4bit samples sound crap anyways :=P
|
| |
tlr
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1790 |
Quote: yep, add a DC bias of 8 to the original sample, and compose the regular sid tune with volume=8 .... and as for compensating the non linear behaviour...mmh...i'm not sure if anyone would actually notice, 4bit samples sound crap anyways :=P
Maybe that's why it sounds crap. ;)
Seriously though, it's fairly simple to correct for the non-linearity for samples only, i.e no sid-voices. Most samplers are 8-bit anyway, so the original resolution is there.
It is probably pointless to do this when samples are combined with sid-voices because the intermodulation will take over anyway.
I'm also not sure if the non-linearities are equal on different revisions of the chip. Maybe it's time to read the C=Hacking article. :) |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386 |
the non linearity is (among other things) related to the external capacitors, thus +/-10% difference on different c64s. not quite worth the effort to compensate this imho :=P oh and playing stuff on the sid voices at the same time wont make it exactly better either :=) |
| |
MRT
Account closed
Registered: Sep 2005
Posts: 149 |
:-D
Thanx guys...
Still, I've seen some demos which use fairly good samples combined with normal SID music while playing a rotating starfield (Or was it a rotating dot-scroller? I'll have to look that up when I'm at home again).
So, it must be possible do all those things at the same time.
Ah well... For the thing I'm thingking of programming, the overall volume (SID master volume) would prolly work just fine.
|
| |
tlr
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1790 |
Quote: the non linearity is (among other things) related to the external capacitors, thus +/-10% difference on different c64s. not quite worth the effort to compensate this imho :=P oh and playing stuff on the sid voices at the same time wont make it exactly better either :=)
Huh? I'm not talking about the frequency response here. I'm talking about the steps of the output volume MDAC. These steps are not linear, they are logarithmic. Their absolute size is probably dependant on the silicon batch, but I'm guessing that their relative size is not.
Differences of the relative size may ofcourse exist between different revisions of the chip though. |
... 4 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| Previous - 1 | 2 - Next |
