| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1648 |
codebase.c64.org
Hello!
Just wanted to tell you all that the C64 codebase wiki now got a proper URL and can be accessed through:
http://codebase.c64.org/
Enjoy! Greetings to Slaygon for supplying the URL. Now you don't have to remember that old weird URL. ;)
Keep on adding your stuff!
//FTC
|
|
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5094 |
Great work guys!
btw how about advertising the site? lemon64 / c64.sk / pouet / c64.org for example. atleast the bigger c64 crossroads of the web should have a link to it. |
| |
icon
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 90 |
Ah, great! Sorry but I forgot to fix that! Now everything is in order... Splendid job on the site! |
| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1648 |
@Oswald: Yes.. that will be done. Concerning c64.sk there was also some idea to make a rss-feed visible there. The wiki has some support for that.
@Icon: No problemz. Btw, right now the codebase.c64.org URL seems to link to the site by hiding the old URL within a frame, which means the user won't see URLs to different pages in the browser. Would it be easy to make a more proper "link" from the URL to your server so that the ~cswiki folder would transparently appear to be the root from the viewpoint of the site? |
| |
Fungus
Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 686 |
AS long as lamers like wdr dont start attacking the site. It is almost guaranteed he will do this.
|
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386 |
yes, i would also strongly recommend to have (manually verified) accounts, it would be sad to see that site go down in wiki-vandalism |
| |
CreaMD
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3057 |
Quote: Great work guys!
btw how about advertising the site? lemon64 / c64.sk / pouet / c64.org for example. atleast the bigger c64 crossroads of the web should have a link to it.
as Frantic mentioned. I would like to make sort of "latest additions to codebase" column. Similar to Latest CSDB posts.. etc. Also I will add button to affiliates. This is a very good project. I like the idea.
As for manual account checking. I'm all for. Also zero tolerance to idiotic behaviour would save some time for serous stuff. |
| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1648 |
Sure, but that kind of trouble just isn't there yet. I have backups of the site, so.. no worries. The day it happens, well, let's take those troubles at that point in time. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386 |
frantic: thats no good strategy. (having accounts also makes tracking changes in the wiki much easier) |
| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1648 |
gpz: I see a huge drawback in making it hard for people to edit the wiki. What exactly is this big danger you see? If someone fucks the wiki, then there is the backups (which are made regularly)... ...including the fact that there is logs and all old revisions of pages are stored and so on.
The day someone start to fuck it up, then there is always the option to make access rights more restricted. Until that day, why make it even one inch less easy to access the functions on the site than necessary? |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386 |
the point is that it WILL be fucked up. as soon as its advertised a bit and the link is known to google the spambots will come, wait and see :) |
... 24 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 - Next |
