| |
dEViLOCk
Registered: Jul 2011
Posts: 12 |
Please state SID Model in your releases!
As the SID models 6581 and 8580 sound totally different I think it really should be mandatory to state the SID model in every release (in "production notes" or so), if possible also the chip version (production year, revision, etc...) to make the music sound exactly the way the composer intended it to sound while producing it. Pleeaaaase! Thanx!
|
|
| |
booker
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 334 |
Don't worry. Whoever cares their tunes to be heard as composed always says the chip model. ;) |
| |
Sander
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 496 |
Tags :) (hi oswald!) |
| |
Linus
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 639 |
Nah, the coders should implement a sidchip detection routine and let the production crash if the desired chip was not found.
/me ducks and hides :)
Tags, yeah! |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386 |
i want to send you all back to 1989 and see you complain about SID revision used in $partycompo. |
| |
Burglar
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 1102 |
I want to bring you back to 2011, where tags would be a very nice feature on a frequently used website like this ;) |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386 |
seeing how people cant even fill in the existing "tags" correctly, i dont see how that'd solve anything. |
| |
Count Zero
Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 1933 |
Linus: that check should be in the music routine already! |
| |
enthusi
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 677 |
Just add SID revision in AKA field and will be searchable via the current CSDb interface. All fine. |
| |
Conjuror
Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 168 |
Have CSDB's system extract it directly from the uploaded SID :D. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386 |
it does o_O |
... 10 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| Previous - 1 | 2 - Next |
