| |
Bamu®
Account closed
Registered: May 2005
Posts: 1332 |
"START NEW TOPIC" button...
Would it be a problem to locate the "START NEW TOPIC" button at the upper side of the threads. |
|
... 46 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5086 |
- THE TOPIC HAS BEEN CLOSED - |
| |
CreaMD
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3048 |
Quote: I've always thought that you are a cool man. But now...
Anyway, this won't help you.
Yes I'm a cool man. Your opinion about me won't change it. (I'm starting to sound like Timbo).
Anyway. Consider what I said, next time you are going to make mess.
|
| |
fade
Account closed
Registered: Mar 2002
Posts: 290 |
in this thread i am pinching everyone on the buttcheeks. |
| |
Bamu®
Account closed
Registered: May 2005
Posts: 1332 |
Quote: Yes I'm a cool man. Your opinion about me won't change it. (I'm starting to sound like Timbo).
Anyway. Consider what I said, next time you are going to make mess.
Aha!
What have I done this time?
This was a serious thread until you are entered and started to make your comments:
From Mr CreaMD:
("START NEW TOPIC" button should be completely disabled for you, Nata. You are using it way too often.)
... and then you threaten me with banning from CSDB? *sigh* |
| |
yago
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 333 |
I cant find the "Post Reply"-button, otherwise i would post a reply.
|
| |
Laxity
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 459 |
I must say that I cannot find grounds to ban you from here, Nata - even though I find you most annoying! You haven't IMO done more destructive things than:
1. renaming you account and downvoting me because I didn't agree with you in a discussion. (and the account of a friend of yours to do that same..?)
2. being bigheaded about your own abilities and views.
3. Having no respect for peoples work.
4. Being a complete turn-around.
None of those things seems to me to be serious enough to ban you. All that said, the "Ignore all posts from this user" function could be applied in any case from any other user - a good alternative to banning you. I've not applied that function yet, because somehow your immature behaviour and disillusional view of your own person is strangely amusing. Just like the CSDb village idiot. |
| |
Bamu®
Account closed
Registered: May 2005
Posts: 1332 |
Quote: I must say that I cannot find grounds to ban you from here, Nata - even though I find you most annoying! You haven't IMO done more destructive things than:
1. renaming you account and downvoting me because I didn't agree with you in a discussion. (and the account of a friend of yours to do that same..?)
2. being bigheaded about your own abilities and views.
3. Having no respect for peoples work.
4. Being a complete turn-around.
None of those things seems to me to be serious enough to ban you. All that said, the "Ignore all posts from this user" function could be applied in any case from any other user - a good alternative to banning you. I've not applied that function yet, because somehow your immature behaviour and disillusional view of your own person is strangely amusing. Just like the CSDb village idiot.
1. I did not rename my account for downvoting you. (It was done afterwards and not because of you)
But if people can give a 10, people even can give a 1. This is quite common here at csdb.
2. Ok, sometimes.
3. Which works? Cracking/training unprotected, unfinished mini-games can't be elite. |
| |
CreaMD
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3048 |
Quote: Aha!
What have I done this time?
This was a serious thread until you are entered and started to make your comments:
From Mr CreaMD:
("START NEW TOPIC" button should be completely disabled for you, Nata. You are using it way too often.)
... and then you threaten me with banning from CSDB? *sigh*
I'm sure I'm not alone here who thinks that it would be better (even for your image of musician) if you have been banned of the CSDB. Your behaviour resembles pubescent. Laxity wrote it very clearly. You're acting like a village idiot and only reason that people don't ignore you is because they find it amusing. It makes them feel more confident with yourself around.
Maybe of first look you are harmless, but I wouldn't agree with that. It would be best for you and everyone else here, if you were banned, or if you left on your own. Or if you grew up. But I doubt that you are capable of that. If you were, you would already have changed your behaviour after the things that I and other people told you publicly or privately. |
| |
Bamu®
Account closed
Registered: May 2005
Posts: 1332 |
Sorry, but I didn't forced you to reply to my questions in this thread. Why don't you ingnore?
Instead you add your irrelevant comments just to start another popular "nata slagging wave". Are you an adult or not?
---
Btw: This is what you (CreaMD) wrote some time ago to me.(via PM) So, I'm not the only man who ist against todays "cracker" behaviour:
"I had a lot of clashes with today crackers about cracking of those few NEW games released on c64. I said that it's not only crime, but unfair to they fellow sceners (because now, when scene is shrinked, most of the games are produced by enthusiasts and there is no real market for ppl to earn big bucks)."
---
Banned? For what? For being a honest human? |
| |
CreaMD
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3048 |
Quote: Sorry, but I didn't forced you to reply to my questions in this thread. Why don't you ingnore?
Instead you add your irrelevant comments just to start another popular "nata slagging wave". Are you an adult or not?
---
Btw: This is what you (CreaMD) wrote some time ago to me.(via PM) So, I'm not the only man who ist against todays "cracker" behaviour:
"I had a lot of clashes with today crackers about cracking of those few NEW games released on c64. I said that it's not only crime, but unfair to they fellow sceners (because now, when scene is shrinked, most of the games are produced by enthusiasts and there is no real market for ppl to earn big bucks)."
---
Banned? For what? For being a honest human?
Banned for spamming the forum and reactions. For acting subersively in the community. And the things that Laxity mentioned.And the things that I've told you privately.
I gave you advices in good faith but you don't seem to listen to them. I'm sorry, but the best thing you would do now is to silence yourself and think about the things I've told you so many times. For your own good. |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 - Next |
