| |
Zyron
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 2381 |
Cooperations
I was going to submit some cracks from Ikari+Talent when I noticed to my surprise that there's no entry for this coop yet.
What's the though about this? Should I add I+T as a new group or should I credit all I+T cracks to both groups?
I'd say a new group is needed to make it easier to find the releases from the coop more easily.
There's already a couple of other coops added, such as Success + The Ruling Company, <group id=843>, WOW+ROLE. |
|
... 27 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Earthshaker
Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 118 |
But its still a fact that people aren't a member of a coop, but just a member of one of the groups in that coop. So you cant add em as member of the coop, just as member of one of those groups.
I really think that the option i mentioned before should be implented and not only in a v2 version of the database. Who knows how long that will take before that version arrives.
All coop entries i entered, are just credited to the two groups in that coop.
|
| |
Zyron
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 2381 |
There are cases were a coop needs a separate entry to store information which is specific for the coop only but not valid for any of the involved groups alone. |
| |
V-12
Registered: Nov 2003
Posts: 206 |
It would be nonsense to add to CSDB all cooperations as the new groups. I agree with H.O. opinion about coops, they should be credited for both group.
|
| |
CyberBrain
Administrator
Posts: 392 |
I must admit i don't know much about how these coops excatly worked. But werent some of the coops more like groups (having own members, etc), than just two groups working together? |
| |
SECRET MAN
Account closed
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 336 |
I remember a lot of Cooperations like:
Genesis + Fire Eagle
Alpha Flight + Paramount
Light Circle + Radwar
Fantasy Cracking Service + The Last Science
Online+Ikari
Image+The Blasters
Beastie Boys + The light Circle
Federation against Copyright+The Lost Science
Wanderer Group+Pentacle
Trianon + Starline
Madsquad+ C64CG
Trsi+Dytec
and so........ |
| |
Tch
Account closed
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 512 |
Quote: I must admit i don't know much about how these coops excatly worked. But werent some of the coops more like groups (having own members, etc), than just two groups working together?
It was very uncommon for someone to be in two groups (musicians the exception).
And if they were,it was more being a member of a sub-group within the group.
Especially crackers stuck to one group only.
All coops I know of,had no ´coop-members´.
It was always mentioned which group the cracker was part of. |
| |
Graham
Account closed
Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 990 |
If a cooperation is so "strong" that you cannot tell which person is member of which group, then it is not a coop anymore but a new group which just has the name "X + Y soft". |
| |
The Arrogance
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 36 |
Indeed Dishy, i sorted the mess by deleting the whole so called group "Success + X-Ray", as it wasn't actually a group, but just a coop. Guess other cooperations should be handled the same way, but this is none of my business.. former members may do so or not! About Success + The Ruling Company.. well, opinions differ, but for me, it wasn't a group either, but a cooperation.. whatever, it's all history, nothing to really bother about! ;)
"Have a nice day" to everyone.
L8er.
T. |
| |
Zyron
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 2381 |
After some consideration I decided to remove Ikari+Talent & change the credits for the 3 releases I added to the 2 individual groups instead. |
| |
SECRET MAN
Account closed
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 336 |
Yep Zyron,I think thats the right way. |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 - Next |
