Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > C64 Composing > Oldskool vs Newskool
2010-03-01 11:06
SIDWAVE
Account closed

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2238
Oldskool vs Newskool

It seems that some people are stuck in a fantasy that every single tune coming on the C64, must:

1. have beats like Jeroen Tel
2. have melody like drax
3. have sounds like rob hubbard
4. be crazy inspiring like ben daglish
5. and that it has to have the smoothes baby ass 1988 bass filter
6. and so on...

so what is oldskool ?
1986 sounds ?
or 'playing it safe' ?

and what is newskool ?
be a copy of linus ?

It seems there are some persons who dont realize that HVSC has about every style of music on earth in it.

You can find old classical piano tunes, mostly people made them before hubbard religion came :D
then hubbard religion came, and everybody want to follow it, the most prominent child of hubby is jt.
although different style... its still a hubbyism...
then 20cc, what is this ? a jt religion..
rock/finnish gold....

We can mention so many.

There are founders of religion, and followers, those make up more than 80% of the composers.

And then there are the innovators, who take a risk, and do something completely new, and weird, or non standard.

Ed, Goto80, Mermaid... that sort of thing..

So, to the point, and ofcourse it is about my latest sid upload :D what else would it be about ? :D

Well, i can claim to call it newskool, because of the fact, it does not follow any of the religions i just mentioned.

You dear listener, should not expect every single tune, to be a melodic, progressive, manio depressive gut wrenching tune comparable to the depths of drax's mind.

You are in error.

There is more than just drax'ism :D

Specifically i would call my tune 'industrial techno', its the closest i can come to some kinda description. and as such, it is extremely well in its own class.

As a 'standard' C64 style tune, based on the religions mentioned, it is ofcourse completely off.

To the final point:

I appreciate your comments whatever they are, but when you f.ex write: there isnt much progression, or i would wish there was more melody, then dear listener, you have misunderstood it: industrial techno has no progressive melodic element :D

What is oldskool : when you follow the traditions
what is newskool : when you dont

That is all.
 
... 44 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2010-03-02 21:06
null
Account closed

Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 645
How about this:

Everyone has a different taste and opinion about music, so instead of whining about it let's all stfu and enjoy/create music.

</thread>

------------------------------------
http://zomgwtfbbq.info
2010-03-03 00:08
Yazoo

Registered: Nov 2006
Posts: 227
yea, its a matter of taste... i voted you a 3 on your latest tune because for me it almost totally sucks, but a 9 for your datastorm tune because it ruled for me. i always try to be honest when voting... keep experimenting, but dont be pissed when ppl sometimes dont like what comes out of it. you know... when ppl downvote my pictures its np as long i like the pic myself. i am not a musician, so i dont care if something is technically well done or whatever. i just love music when it "hits" me... and sometimes it does, sometimes it doesnt.
2010-03-03 00:15
Ksubi
Account closed

Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 87
There's always a risk of rejection when we expose our "art" to the public. Art is such a subjective / personal experience that rarely 2 people see/hear/feel the same thing.
2010-03-17 15:50
NecroPolo

Registered: Jun 2009
Posts: 231
There are many good points in this thread.


New school vs old-school - there is no clear definition for that I guess. Maybe, you say 'wow that's old-school sounding' when you hear something that reminds you of the times when SID composing was not about using a "holy grail" editor. The holy grail was the musician and his knowledge of C64 back in the times when everything needed to be invented. Even though methods were raw and imperfect, every and each music driver had personality. The spreading of first really effective editors put an end to that period of time. Perhaps, new school started with Chris Hülsbeck and Charles Deenen. Their editors were among the firsts that opened the eyes of the public for SID composing.


+/- feedback... awww :)

It is nice to hear anyone's any opinion but shall never be considered or taken too deep. Considering opinions separates product from art.

Contemporaty SID music is art, a total free and underground one. So, do it your way and never look back, end of story :)
2010-11-24 02:19
Danko

Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 19
The reason howcome most of my old SIDs suck (besides me being short of a toddler at the time of creation), is that I just played around with sounds and shit for my own well being following my own ideas and thoughts. How's that for old skool focus?

I figure my own conceptions that were not blatant attempts to mimic Hubbard, Galway or Bogg were probably a tad bit better than the ones that were.

You can either place me in the "old skool" compartment or, god forbid, that dreadful "Danko" compartment.

Well, then there's that 15 minute experiment called "Plasticpop". It was an over obvious attempt to mimic and ridicule that contemporary Drax style for the fun of it. Just look at what happened many years later...

But I digress.

Oldskool to me?

Action Biker by Rob Hubbard.



Cheers,

Danko
2010-11-24 09:17
Stainless Steel

Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 966
Oldschool as Danko said is among the tunes of Rob Hubbard (Phantom of the Asteroids, International Karate ..)

Newschool still is to me guys like JT and Drax etc :-D

And who's this Linus you keep talking about ?

2010-11-24 12:28
Linus

Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 639
That guy you keep on sending worktunes to so he can provide you with tips on how to improve them.
2010-11-24 16:15
Soren

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 547
Yeah, some people think that every tune they do is AMAZING!
But it's really not like that at all...
I aim at doing music that is not annoying to listen and sometimes I manage to do something that I am quite pleased with.
For me sounds and how they are handled is quite important.
Forexample some people can make nice melodies and some just make something that I barely can stand listening to.
Sorry, but that's how it is.
I don't have much music theory knowledge, but just use my ears.
False notes are also totally unacceptable for me...
it's like.. "forget about it"... :-)
2010-11-24 16:18
Soren

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 547
Also, some people are stuck in fantasy that nomatter what they do, it's OH SO DAMN GOOD! :-)
2010-11-24 16:54
Stainless Steel

Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 966
Well, it's all in the eye of the beholder. Or in this case, the ear of the composer.

And it can take years to train a good set of ears.
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
Mike
kbs/Pht/Lxt
Paul Bearer
Slaxx/Q/HF/MYD!
Brittle/Dentifrice^(?)
REBEL 1/HF
Guests online: 97
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Mojo  (9.7)
4 Coma Light 13  (9.6)
5 The Demo Coder  (9.6)
6 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
7 What Is The Matrix 2  (9.6)
8 Uncensored  (9.6)
9 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
10 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
3 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
4 X-Mas Demo 2024  (9.6)
5 Copper Booze  (9.6)
6 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
7 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
8 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
9 Morph  (9.5)
10 Libertongo  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Booze Design  (9.3)
2 Oxyron  (9.3)
3 Performers  (9.3)
4 Censor Design  (9.3)
5 Triad  (9.3)
Top Musicians
1 Rob Hubbard  (9.7)
2 Mutetus  (9.7)
3 Jeroen Tel  (9.7)
4 Linus  (9.6)
5 Stinsen  (9.6)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.063 sec.