| |
Laxity
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 459 |
Evaluating the moderation of CSDb
I think it's time to evaluate how the moderation of CSDb is going. Good/bad?.. Anyone?
Something just struct my eye. I just saw the "moderation rules" thread (started by Oswald) being closed for no obvious reason (Ok, Steppe said - "close thread?" or something). I disagree in such an approach to moderation. The moderator should not close a thread unless it's going really bad, and warnings have been issued; furthermore I think moderators who personally participate in a discussion should be rendered powerless over moderating that particular discussion. Furthermore, when closing a thread, I think a reason for doing so should be given..
Oh, and this is not supposed to be another "bitching" topic. I'd like to call and everybody interested to state their thoughts. Good AND bad. Not just bad, please!.. |
|
... 150 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5095 |
case closed for me. |
| |
Stainless Steel
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 966 |
So oswald is being "moderated" for him being the oswaldbogar ? come on ! :-D
|
| |
Trazan
Account closed
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 620 |
Thats not the case, No |
| |
Burglar
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 1105 |
Quote: http://noname.c64.org/csdb/forums/?roomid=11&topicid=46803#46841
Burglar:
"heh, you should worry, when even a crappy coder like Oswald can improve your code......
(lets hope the mods dont 'moderate' me;)"
Creamd:
"We are only moderating one person at time. Currently it is Oswald because he is really annoying. ;)"
Groepaz:
"exactly, for now you are save enno :=)"
6. It is therefore not permissable to use CSDb as a media for any kind of personal attacks/discriminating or foul language (using the forum, oneliners, comments on CSDb entries, PM's, deliberate downvoting or anything similar), and any such will be punished with temporarily or permanent exlusion from the site.
exactly as I already said:
"the mods are not keeping rules, instead they use their personal preferences."
sorry, Oswald, I was trying to be funny/sarcastic, I guess I failed and my post can be perceived as trolling, which was not my intention...
oh well, so bad jokes are removed as well now...
so can the moderation team please post a posting template, apparently everything has to be really strict around here and I really don't understand where you boys draw the line.
possible post template:
Hi <nick>,
You are so great, I think you are the best!
bye, <me>
bah bah bah |
| |
Trazan
Account closed
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 620 |
(Posts removed since Oswald felt he was insulted...or something....)
|
| |
Scout
Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 1570 |
OSWALD.....YOU SUCK! |
| |
TDJ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1879 |
Quote: OSWALD.....YOU SUCK!
We all suck from time to time. How else are you going to get that cool drink through that straw into your mouth?
I mean: "WHO MODERATES THE MODERATORS?"
(Yes I know that has nothing to do with the first part of my post but I don't wanna be off-topic too much). |
| |
Stainless Steel
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 966 |
I sense a "Topic closed" approaching.
Thinking of it, i really don't envy the moderators.
In the words of Gorgeous George, "This is going to get messy".
|
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11391 |
Quote:
"WHO MODERATES THE MODERATORS?"
would it make you more happy to know that i am one of the most censored persons ? =P |
| |
Burglar
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 1105 |
Quote: Quote:
"WHO MODERATES THE MODERATORS?"
would it make you more happy to know that i am one of the most censored persons ? =P
so the worst person in terms of following 'the rules' is also judge and executioner on those same rules, that smells kinda fishy doesn't it ;) |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ... | 16 - Next |
