| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5086 |
Rigid moderation poll:yes/no ?
1. should we have a few trusted moderators?
2. should troublemaker accounts be deleted?
3. should troll threads be closed?
my votes:
1. yes
2. yes
3. yes |
|
... 130 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Mace
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799 |
Quoting JazzcatAnd I miss language pointers: e.g. for the CIVITAS BASIC CRAP.
Jazzcat, I understand your anger, but throwing oil on the fire isn't helping anyone.
Please restrain yourself and help to restore the peace and quietness. :) |
| |
BAR.
Account closed
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 324 |
If Manfred Trenz would do a basic demo, you couldn't find it here or if Christian Huelsbeck would do a music for a basic game you couldn't find it here.. if this guys were unknown or did that under a pseudo.. Do you really think
you are right JAZZCAT ?
A-man's music for the crypt release would be lost and so many things more... It happens all the time i know guys feed up with this ELITE talkings.. that they left C64.. They lost interest and much more.. CHANGE YOUR MIND PLEASE.. |
| |
cadaver
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1160 |
There are often two sides to things. On the other hand, we applaud lemon64 for locking the retardscene site thread swiftly. But we wouldn't applaud them for banning Alih some time before for his run-in with Tomz, or would we? There's often a moral right in these cases which is easy to define in hindsight. But who do we trust to define it in realtime?
Certainly, if I think of a strong fair moderation there have been many non-acceptable outbursts here from otherwise respected people, and I'd be OK with equally disallowing them.
On the other hand, a strong biased moderation could make this site into the worst kind of hell imaginable. Separating or deleting entries based on perceived quality (ie. "basic crap") would IMO be quite biased. |
| |
Burglar
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 1085 |
1. yes
2, no, but restrict
3. yes |
| |
Yoko Tv Inc.
Account closed
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 68 |
1.yes
2.yes
3.yes
|
| |
Moloch
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 2924 |
ja
ja
ja
|
| |
Jazzcat
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1044 |
BASIC "crap" as in some basic releases done by crack-groups. They should be marked as they are in the cracking scene; as not receiving any points (because basic doesn't deserve points). Same with "RE-RELEASES", "RECRACKS" (not 'oldies' but real recracks, need definition? lemme know), DOUBLE-TRAINERS and the most ignored one of all on this database concerning cracks: "FIRST RELEASES".
If this is a C64 _SCENE_ Database. Then, maybe this site should heed some advice from people who are directly involved, common-sense approach is needed here. I know Perff is busy (ain't we all?) so more people onboard rather than this one-man show would be great!
Edit: how is the tally going? |
| |
Trazan
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 620 |
This is more like a poll - not a total discussion :)
I would be glad to see a guideline whats OK to release and not, since its really missing on CSDB.
Jazzcat, feel free to make such list!? |
| |
Jazzcat
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1044 |
Trazan: sure. A bit like what is present in the current "List" (release chart)? As well as some extra do's and don't's?
I guess the main point here with SEUCK releases, REcracks and stuff. These things are acceptable when someone just joins the scene, they make a mistake or two and learn from it. What makes some guys angry is that guys like Crypt have been around since 1988/89. You expect more from these people. |
| |
Mace
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799 |
Jazzcat, you really can't stop ranting about it, can you...? Hahaha :-D |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 - Next |
