Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
 Welcome to our latest new user Defilus ! (Registered 2024-10-04) You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Discussions > Adding A BBS Section...
2008-06-11 17:16
The Shadow

Registered: Oct 2007
Posts: 304
Adding A BBS Section...

There have been discussions in the forums, in the past, about adding a BBS section to the CSDb. Perff told me that he would consider adding a BBS section when he finds the time. He does not know much about the great boards that supported the 64. For
such a section to be added, we all must describe more about it.
Detailed information is needed about BBSs, for this to happen. Does anyone have any ideas?
 
... 114 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2008-06-17 22:49
Jazzcat

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1044
BBS Software - yes.

Hardware - nice to know, maybe not quite as important though.

2008-06-17 23:41
DemongerX
Account closed

Registered: Jun 2002
Posts: 137
I agree, bbs software should be a must. You could often tell the feel of a bbs just by the software used(ie. ucbbs is very distinctive in how its setup, whereas you can generally tell if a bbs is a ivory or image or cbase, just by how the prompts respond.)
2008-06-18 15:25
Stan
Account closed

Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 187
BBS software would be appreciated.

Groups and magazines hq-ships regarded as most important.
2008-06-18 17:47
Burglar

Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 1071
also, for presentation, relevant data should also be shown on group/scener/mag/release, so links back to the board pages. but that should be pretty obvious.
2008-06-18 20:51
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11302
burglar: yes ofcourse. all kinds of related "backlinks" are implicit (and well, they are easy to add once the rest is implemented, so thats nothing to get a headache about =P)

mmmh so, basically 3 things are missing from my proposal so far?

1. the bbs software ... imho the best way to reflect this would be simple links to release entries in the bbs entry
field            type               subfield
software used    link to release    timespan  (one or more)


this would make it easily possible to not only point out what software was used, but also credit said software correctly, upload it etc. and most importantly, it would be a lot less problematic than using a selection list, which then would need constant maintenance, and would grow ridiculously large too =P

2. used hardware. i am not really sure how to implement this in a useful way. since there are no database entries for hardware items, pretty much the only way would be a selection list - however that could easily grow into a mess due to all the different stuff that should possibly be in such a list, and it would mean constant maintenance too.

3. associated magazines. this is really a tough one. were there really so many mags with official associated boards that some text or even links in the trivia couldnt cover it properly? however, i cant really think of a decent way how to represent this info in the database at this point - unless someone else has a clever idea :)

2008-06-18 22:45
Burglar

Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 1071
about mags, quite a lot of mags are tied to a magazine staff group, like The Pulse Magazine Staff. so you could use a group as a sort of replacement mag id. not elegant, but simple and easy.
2008-06-18 22:47
Jazzcat

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1044
Groepaz: regarding the magazines and using boards as HQs. AFAIK it was _common_ 'mostly' between 1991-1996. So, not that many... ;)

You can add a website below a group or magazine, why not a BBS?
2008-06-18 23:13
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11302
Quote:

You can add a website below a group or magazine, why not a BBS?


the problem is that there is no single entry for a magazine .... which makes it kinda messy (not impossible, but not quite elagant either).

what burglar said sounds a bit less messy (only one entry linked to the bbs, not every issue of the mag) ... still a bit .. MEEEH =P

*shrug*
2008-06-18 23:19
Jazzcat

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1044
Maybe it should only be included in the trivia section? The only other clean solution I see is adding the 'magazine staff' as the group (which has already been mentioned). That would also mean we would need to add quite a few "staff's" as only a few magazines have added a staff list as a individual entry on this database.
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
Almighty God/Level 6..
Mr SQL
algorithm
Didi/Laxity
SplAtterpunk
Yogibear/Protovision
Jope/Extend
Freeze/Blazon
TheRyk/MYD!
Magic/Nah-Kolor
Xiny6581/Dees Produc..
Pararaum/T7D
cadaver/covertbitops
jicas/Patagonia
tlr
Guests online: 89
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
4 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
5 Mojo  (9.6)
6 Uncensored  (9.6)
7 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
8 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
9 No Bounds  (9.6)
10 Unboxed  (9.5)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.6)
5 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
6 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.5)
7 Morph  (9.5)
8 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
9 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
10 Daah, Those Acid Pil..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Booze Design  (9.3)
2 Oxyron  (9.3)
3 Performers  (9.3)
4 Nostalgia  (9.3)
5 Censor Design  (9.3)
Top Organizers
1 Burglar  (9.9)
2 Sixx  (9.8)
3 hedning  (9.7)
4 Irata  (9.7)
5 Tim  (9.7)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.048 sec.