| |
hedning
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 4734 |
Release id #176969 : Super Mario Bros 64 +2
User Comment
Submitted by hedning [PM] on 19 April 2019
G*P perspective. This is turning into a discussion. Will copy the discussion to the forum.. From my moderator perspective.
User Comment
Submitted by Mr Ammo [PM] on 19 April 2019
"from our perspective". Is that your CSDb moderator / CSDb rules perspective or is it your G*P perspective. I feel there is a conflict of interest when you answer this question.
User Comment
Submitted by hedning [PM] on 19 April 2019
From our perspective they are part of the same release. They were released together as it was meant. And they are both working.
There are many examples on releases that have different sorts of files in the same release: d64 and d81 versions of diskmags, cracks etc. Even mixed easyflash and disk versions of the same release in the same entry as they were released together.
User Comment
Submitted by Mr Ammo [PM] on 19 April 2019
Since the 191 blox version is a different version of this release, shouldn't there be a different release entry for this version as per CSDb rules and what the mods preach?
That way there will be a release entry for a working version and a non-working version for vanilla C64s.User |
|
... 22 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
hedning
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 4734 |
Of course we were in a hurry, and in the middle of the night L.A.Style delivered this as most guys use carts anyway, and also added a non intro version for the others... Because we care... But then, ian: This is for you: Super Mario Bros 64 +2. |
| |
iAN CooG
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 3204 |
it's not about me, it's about making things right and self preservation of YOUR group respectability. |
| |
hedning
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 4734 |
Quote: it's not about me, it's about making things right and self preservation of YOUR group respectability.
Jesus died ffs. Still we want to spread love you way. It's eastern. ;) |
| |
mankeli
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 146 |
shouldn't crappy releases be under dinasours label? |
| |
Jazzcat
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1045 |
LOL |
| |
Acidchild
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 477 |
i just hope that all these needed re-relaeses, which were needed to make because of not proper testing, will be punished
with minus-points in all these release-lists, so we can either see which group needs the most versions until they have a 100% working crack or which group might take a little more time for their releases, but than atleast have the quality on their side. |
| |
hedning
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 4734 |
Shit happens, as both Jazzcat, Goat and all you others know and have experienced, and will experience. Enjoy the chance to have some fun on our expense. Next time it might be you. :) Enjoy the weekend!
Acidchild: Of course. Read the rules. We are not different from others. It's great to see all wishing us well. ;) <3 |
| |
Acidchild
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 477 |
hedning: it's not about you, but in the last time i have the feeling that more and more of such mistakes happen, which could have been avoided. i just hope you guys (all active cracking groups) will forget about the release-rush but start instead to think on quality instead! |
| |
hedning
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 4734 |
Quote: hedning: it's not about you, but in the last time i have the feeling that more and more of such mistakes happen, which could have been avoided. i just hope you guys (all active cracking groups) will forget about the release-rush but start instead to think on quality instead!
I hear ya. But this is not the place to discuss this. However: I've heard rumours about plans to make a Gamer's Guide thing, which would please you and many more. You might even be interested in being in some jury there? |
| |
Acidchild
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 477 |
no thanks, have got enough to do with transfering disks already :) |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 - Next |
