| |
TWR
Account closed
Registered: Jan 2004
Posts: 187 |
Voting
I have a question regarding the votes. I got a 1 vote as a cracker, maybe not that far from the truth actually but anyway... Is it possible to see who voted what? I'm just curious what crack that person have from me, that was so bad? Or is it a trick by a youngsters mind? ;)Have seen this kind of voting in other places too. |
|
... 32 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Moloch
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 2925 |
Who cares about anything?! Let's all make crazy statements... WOOHOO!
|
| |
H.O
Account closed
Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 70 |
This is why all votes should be public, but we've already had that discussion (and fairly recently too)
|
| |
Wanderer
Account closed
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 478 |
Quote: Who cares about crackers anyway, why not spend your time creating something like "demo's", eh ?
Because making demos is an addiction like crack cocaine.
I wish so much I'd kept all of mine, but I didn't...
Say no to crack!!!
|
| |
Jazzcat
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1044 |
We need to receive some more votes for Vandalism News. So for a REAL C64 chart, message me your top 5 votes in coders, graphician, musician, demo group, cracker group, cracker and magazine.
Unlike the chart in this database, there is no down-voting. People earn their positions and these positions are reflected in a chart (holding to the true and traditional chart on C64).
|
| |
V-12
Registered: Nov 2003
Posts: 206 |
CSDb is full of anonymous downvoting, I think that the vote system here is useless, this is not a disc mag. We should not care about votes here. Why don't you fill the votesheet for some discmag ?
From my side, I wish to see more new demos than cracks. |
| |
The Arrogance
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 36 |
Indeed, too much senseless down-voting.. these charts onhere don't reflect anything, just because the whole voting-system is almost begging for manipulation done by biased people, who, for whatever reason, still seem to carry on bad vibrations about people/groups, they were in trouble with years ago.
The easiest solution: get rid of that voting-system, create a new one without that senseless proportional-average-calculation feature, just count the Votes the way it was done for so many years. If someone voted 1 point or 10 points for a person/group, than simply add it/them to the summary for that person/group. If people don't vote for you or your group, than you might not have done anything worth to remember to deserve a vote, easy as that and the problem with the "downvotes" is solved.
Whatever, someone please wake me up, are we really discussing 64 charts in the year 2005 ?! ^^
L8er.
T. |
| |
Earthshaker
Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 118 |
Quote: Indeed, too much senseless down-voting.. these charts onhere don't reflect anything, just because the whole voting-system is almost begging for manipulation done by biased people, who, for whatever reason, still seem to carry on bad vibrations about people/groups, they were in trouble with years ago.
The easiest solution: get rid of that voting-system, create a new one without that senseless proportional-average-calculation feature, just count the Votes the way it was done for so many years. If someone voted 1 point or 10 points for a person/group, than simply add it/them to the summary for that person/group. If people don't vote for you or your group, than you might not have done anything worth to remember to deserve a vote, easy as that and the problem with the "downvotes" is solved.
Whatever, someone please wake me up, are we really discussing 64 charts in the year 2005 ?! ^^
L8er.
T.
That sounds like a nice solution. The only fact you get then, is that the newer productions would take some time to get as much points as the old ones. Did i explain that well? |
| |
CreaMD
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3053 |
Eartshaker, but that's okay... that's called popularity.. ;-) |
| |
TDJ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1879 |
Argh .. it's the discussion that won't die .. I'm not going to mention all those nice solutions I already provided in the past again .. |
| |
The Arrogance
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 36 |
Quote: That sounds like a nice solution. The only fact you get then, is that the newer productions would take some time to get as much points as the old ones. Did i explain that well?
Earthshaker, well, i see your point, but hey, isn't all this about nostalgia anyway ?! So what's so bad about it, if people like some older demo/group more than a new one and even if it's just because it is old and retro ?! That's the reason why most of us hang around here.
Anyway, shouldn't be too difficult to find a solution for that problem aswell. Let's simply have an official cut between oldschool and newschool, 2 devided charts and the like. I did never really like that mixing of those 2 completely different scenes from back then and nowadays anyway.
L8er.
T. |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 - Next |
