Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > C64 Coding > What assembler/compiler are you using?
2010-03-16 20:44
Mace

Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799
What assembler/compiler are you using?

Since I kind of switched from 64TASS to Kick Assembler, I was wondering what the other coders use as coding tool?
Still working on the C64 with TASM or do you use one of the cross development compilers?
 
... 47 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2010-05-07 22:03
Slammer

Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 416
Nothing wrong with old dinosaurs, Everybody define his own level of retroness :-)
2010-05-08 10:25
yago

Registered: May 2002
Posts: 333
Slammer: doesnt your code just generate the ldas stas and a list with the addresses, but no labels?
2010-05-08 14:48
Slammer

Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 416
Yago: Yes, thats correct. This was started by Ervins post, who asked how to unroll a loop, save some referencepoints to labels and store the labels to memory with a .word command. RadiantX and yourself showed solutions for ca65 and k2asm. I showed another approach where a list was used to hold the the referencepoints instead.
2010-05-09 08:24
Kaizen

Registered: May 2009
Posts: 24
My setup: DASM and TextWrangler for Mac.
I can work well with them but I would like to know what cross assembler tool have the most classical/standard assembly synthax... is it 64TASS?
2010-05-09 09:43
enthusi

Registered: May 2004
Posts: 677
When you use acme you can convert TASS SEQ-files to acme-sources with a few renames only...
!byte instead of .byte and so on.

AFAIK its pseudo PC is handled similar as well.
2010-05-09 11:01
Oswald

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5094
Kaizen, yes 64 tass. you have a few goodie extras like +/- labels, for/next,if/then, etc. check the manual. :)
2010-05-09 12:34
Kaizen

Registered: May 2009
Posts: 24
@Oswald: Thanks! :-)
2010-05-11 19:20
Zone
Account closed

Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 7
I use ca65. I mostly code applications and it suits me well. It surely is a bit of work to start a new project, creating Makefiles and such, but once the project grows, it becomes really handy.

On a real C64 I prefer Fairlight's XASS (a heavily modified TASS for REU units). Unlike Style's new TMP+REU, it not only backups your soure and assembler but also the included REU monitor and all of your gfx/msx data - making machine crashes less frustrating. :)
2010-05-12 13:50
Martin Piper

Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 722
I'm still using ACME with extra tweaks to add label saving for VICE and proper library search paths. You can get the full sources from http://www.wellytop.com/C64.html
2010-05-18 09:07
AlexC

Registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 299
Maybe a bit off topic but I find it interesting: I started to transfer my dev tools to AmigaOS 4.1. Vice works quite well with exception of sound problems, and Exomizer works perfectly :)
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
t0m3000/hf^boom!^ibx
Peacemaker/CENSOR/Hi..
Fungus/Nostalgia
WVL/Xenon
Matt
marley
ged/Samar
rexbeng
Technotron/I-I F
Guests online: 116
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Mojo  (9.7)
4 Coma Light 13  (9.6)
5 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
6 What Is The Matrix 2  (9.6)
7 The Demo Coder  (9.6)
8 Uncensored  (9.6)
9 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
10 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 No Listen  (9.6)
2 Layers  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
5 Copper Booze  (9.6)
6 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
7 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
8 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
9 Morph  (9.5)
10 Libertongo  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Performers  (9.3)
2 Booze Design  (9.3)
3 Oxyron  (9.3)
4 Censor Design  (9.3)
5 Triad  (9.3)
Top Musicians
1 Rob Hubbard  (9.7)
2 Mutetus  (9.7)
3 Jeroen Tel  (9.7)
4 Linus  (9.6)
5 Stinsen  (9.6)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.143 sec.