Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Discussions > CSDb: quantify me
2010-08-02 23:16
Mr. Mouse

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 235
CSDb: quantify me

CSDb-based quantitative analyses of the C64 Scene

http://www.xentax.com/?page_id=235
 
... 109 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2010-08-04 12:36
Shadow
Account closed

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 355
Yeah, I'm not quite seeing the "decline" in the scene in '88 or whenever it was supposed to be.
That's when it just started getting good!
Maybe the number of releases went down, mainly as earlier mentioned due to declining number of commercial games and as follows fewer cracks, but the quality of C64 demos continued climbing for sure!
2010-08-04 12:59
Conrad

Registered: Nov 2006
Posts: 847
The moral of the thread, is that divisionalisation is still kicking in 2010, in both the scene and the world!
2010-08-04 13:02
Jazzcat

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1044
Conrad: indeed

Crackers, Demo Sceners, Cnetters, US board scene, mail scene... so many angles to the underground world of C64.
2010-08-04 13:14
Sander

Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 493
C'mon guys - let's keep it tidy.

@STE: Yes, i stand corrected, there was plenty of assuming involved in that last paragraph :)

As for further analysis, i'd be very keen to see some kind of 'social mapping'. How sceners and groups were connected socially and demographically.
If someday (scroll/note/magazine) texts from productions become available, i think it must be possible to do this one way or the other. This could reveal some kind of 'importance' aswell, based on the number of times mentioned in different productions. I guess a little brainstorm about this could lead to plenty interesting angles to visualize trends.

I'm still dreaming of smart image recognition software, combined with tags (..) this could theoretically lead to a nice timeline/branch of influentual artists/work. For music, effects etc there must some kind of possibilities aswell.

It sounds very tricky and probably very naive.. As i lack all experience/knowledge in this field, except for the pretty pictures it can generate ;)
2010-08-04 13:33
Mr. Mouse

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 235
What should be done is build a more sturdy and scientifically oriented CSDb that has a focus on answering these questions, instead of just collecting C64-programs via sloppy and noisy upload screens with lots of room for missing values, wrong credits, and erroneous data. Indeed, more qualitative data is also welcome, such as c64-text analyses and articles about the c64 (scene) to date and type what actually went on. Problem with CSDb is that is was not build with that in mind, though it should have as that is what a database is really about: to be able to draw sound conclusions.
2010-08-04 13:59
Oswald

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5086
Quote: yeah, it a pity u didnt put a bit more work into the last version of p1 mate. u managed to break just about everything that was working when you "borrowed" the routines.

Steve


probably, but without bugreports they will stay. time to look into your request tho, I'll do it right away.
2010-08-04 14:00
Oswald

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5086
Quoting Mr. Mouse
that is what a database is really about: to be able to draw sound conclusions.


for you. I believe to most of us csdb is the scene as cnet was for others.
2010-08-04 14:22
Mr. Mouse

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 235
Quote: Quoting Mr. Mouse
that is what a database is really about: to be able to draw sound conclusions.


for you. I believe to most of us csdb is the scene as cnet was for others.


The scene? That's the comments and forums at CSDb. That's where the social interaction is, granted. But those have nothing to do with the actual database, that collects the raw release data. If you're calling it a database, it should be as robust as possible, in my book. Because then you have a very valuable tool. It has always been very hard for people at CSDb to deal with constructive criticism and dogma rules. So be it. Perhaps one day we should set up a new database.
2010-08-04 14:46
Stainless Steel

Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 966
No doubt, Cnet was pretty important and big in the UK back then. But i dare to say for everyone else outside of the UK who didnt have access to it, it wasnt that important.

I've heard about CNET back in the day, but it didnt really have much importance to me as it wasnt available here. Agreed, who am I, but still.

And surely you guys arent implying that the UK scene was the alpha and the omega while the rest of the world was busy getting laid, drunk or both.

Which reminds me, what "scene" are we talking 'bout ? Demo or Cracking ?
2010-08-04 17:10
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11350
Quote:
The scene? That's the comments and forums at CSDb.


the day "the scene" is only about babble and not releases, i will delete csdb. promised.
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
theK/ATL
Jazzcat/Onslaught
Guests online: 117
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
4 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
5 Mojo  (9.6)
6 Uncensored  (9.6)
7 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
8 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
9 No Bounds  (9.6)
10 Christmas Megademo  (9.5)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.6)
5 Libertongo  (9.5)
6 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
7 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
8 Morph  (9.5)
9 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
10 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Performers  (9.3)
2 Booze Design  (9.3)
3 Oxyron  (9.3)
4 Nostalgia  (9.3)
5 Censor Design  (9.3)
Top Musicians
1 Rob Hubbard  (9.7)
2 Jeroen Tel  (9.7)
3 Mutetus  (9.7)
4 Jammer  (9.6)
5 Stinsen  (9.6)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.078 sec.