| |
ChristopherJam
Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 1409 |
Assembler preferences.
Two questions:
- what's everyone using these days?
- on large productions, do groups tend to enforce a single assembler for the entire project, or is the code base a bit heterogenous?
I'd like to keep this discussion purely focussed on assemblers; please leave code generators, loader toolchains etc for that other thread.
(as for me, I'm still using xa65 for most projects) |
|
... 204 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386 |
* = $1000
nop
* = $2000
nop
what should go to $1001-$1fff ? -> initmem |
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5094 |
ah! thx |
| |
Fungus
Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 686 |
@soci
Ah yes, that's exactly what I meant. I was still doing it the old tass way with using calculations :)
hrm... we need wiki's for these things. CSDB needs a wiki system :D |
| |
soci
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 480 |
Calculations are fine if you don't mind a second symbol.
There's codebase64, so I think we have a wiki already. |
| |
Fungus
Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 686 |
I meant a wiki in general dedicated to use of tools and what not. :) |
| |
AlexC
Registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 299 |
Quote: I meant a wiki in general dedicated to use of tools and what not. :)
There is already codebase64 wiki but page about cross tools is terrible outdated - just like many other parts of this great site - for example it provides link to long gone ACME homepage. Wouldn't it be better if try to update codebase64 instead of creating another wiki? |
| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1648 |
@AlexC: Doh.. About the same time spent on complaining about the acme link not being up to date would have been sufficient to update the link instead. :) (Not meant as an attack just a reflection.)
Anyway.. the link is now updated. |
| |
AlexC
Registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 299 |
I can now add Virtual Assembler to the list of natively running assemblers. The only drawback is that it seems to be based on non-macro Turbo Assembler version and missing macros or includes could be painful sometimes. Otherwise it is one of best tools you can run on your C64 and one of very few supporting SCPU. |
| |
Wisdom
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 90 |
KickAssembler since last year, before that it was 64tass. |
| |
AlexC
Registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 299 |
Quote: KickAssembler since last year, before that it was 64tass.
Out of curiosity could you elaborate a bit why you've switched from 64tass to KickAssembler? |
| Previous - 1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | ... | 22 - Next |
