| |
Didi
Registered: Nov 2011
Posts: 487 |
Release id #59431 : Random Intro
This intro is tagged as Ikari+Talent release because it was created by Excell/I+T. Refering to my understanding this should be a release from the group Random at the time the group used it OR a group release of Random + a personal release of Excell. It might also be a release of I+T AND Random, but that seems to be wrong.
(This is just a discussion example for how to tag it correctly). |
|
| |
bepp
Registered: Jun 2010
Posts: 265 |
I've tagged similar releases with creator group and "using" group. In this case I +T and Random. But a personal release and Random might be more appropriate. Regardless, Random has to be in the list else its wrong. |
| |
Didi
Registered: Nov 2011
Posts: 487 |
The cracking group itself is mandatory to mention in my eyes, because usually a crack intro becomes "released" by first usage infront of a crack by the cracking group. So the release date should be date of first usage if it can be determined. Finished in case the creator belongs to the cracking group.
If someone not releated to this group created it, it's the question if it is a personal release of the creator or the group he/she belongs to. For historic entries this might be hard to determine if it was a personal or group release. It might also be right not to mention the creator as releaser and just set the credits for code, etc. This seems to be the best and most clean way to do it.
The Creator is usually the coder who put the things together. |
